Author Topic: Does The Nikon AF-S 17-35mm Still Cut It?  (Read 8701 times)

thirtyfivemill

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • You ARE NikonGear
    • THIRTYFIVEMILL.COM
Does The Nikon AF-S 17-35mm Still Cut It?
« on: January 05, 2018, 20:01:23 »
I'm in need of a good wide angle zoom which will be paired with my D700. Now I'm fairly sure the Nikon AF-S 17-35mm will pair well with the 12mp D700 but there have been a fair few new comers to the market since I last researched this particular range. For many years (on the recommendation of Bjorn who I met up with in Oslo for a shoot going back just over 20 years ago when I was training as a pilot in Sweden ((Hi Bjorn!!)) I shot with the 20-35 on a D1X and loved that lens and would consider that one again but I'd like something tad wider.

My conundrum has resulted from reading the reviews about the 18-35 AF-S G, the 16-35 VR and the slightly worrying problems some have encountered with failing motors on their 17-35s.

This lens will be used for 60% landscape photography and 40% general. The 2.8 is nice but probably not critical, especially if we take the VR of the 16-35 into the equation. At the moment I flit from one leaning to another, seemingly always coming back to the 17-35mm but that's probably because it's a lens I know.

So, what's the advice folks? Which of those 3 should I picking for my D700 or have I missed a lens I should be considering? There's a thought process that maybe I should break the bank and find a 14-24mm but I'm really trying to keep this purchase to around the £300-500 mark.

Duncan

bobfriedman

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 1263
  • Massachusetts, USA
Re: Does The Nikon AF-S 17-35mm Still Cut It?
« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2018, 20:44:47 »
i have had two of these... the latest was purchased to do IR photography since there are very few wide angle lenses with filter threads that i know work in the IR..  aside from that the lens has always been a reasonably good performer.. there are some complaints about distortion at the wider angles going away at 20mm but as long as you hold it level should be reasonable.. i have the 14-24/2.8G and the Zeiss 15 both require leveling or you run the risk of distortion..

my latest was purchased on ebay for $600 and has an AF squeak which doesn't bother me.. most of the 17-35/2.8D's had this affliction.  so for that price (and its still in the inventory) i would say a good catch.
Robert L Friedman, Massachusetts, USA
www.pbase.com/bobfriedman

thirtyfivemill

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • You ARE NikonGear
    • THIRTYFIVEMILL.COM
Re: Does The Nikon AF-S 17-35mm Still Cut It?
« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2018, 21:11:06 »
i have had two of these... the latest was purchased to do IR photography since there are very few wide angle lenses with filter threads that i know work in the IR..  aside from that the lens has always been a reasonably good performer.. there are some complaints about distortion at the wider angles going away at 20mm but as long as you hold it level should be reasonable.. i have the 14-24/2.8G and the Zeiss 15 both require leveling or you run the risk of distortion..

my latest was purchased on ebay for $600 and has an AF squeak which doesn't bother me.. most of the 17-35/2.8D's had this affliction.  so for that price (and its still in the inventory) i would say a good catch.

Good grief, that's a blast from the past. I do believe I used to chat to you on photo.net a couple of decades ago, too, Bob!

Thanks for that. I think if this lens was being paired with a D800/810 I might be thinking slightly differently but for the D700 the 17-35 should be a very good lens. But have the optics improved to a point that the cheaper 18-35 or newer 16-35 are actually better performers or does the 17-35 still easily hold it's own in such company, I wonder?

bobfriedman

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 1263
  • Massachusetts, USA
Re: Does The Nikon AF-S 17-35mm Still Cut It?
« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2018, 23:02:05 »
I think if this lens was being paired with a D800/810 I might be thinking slightly differently but for the D700 the 17-35 should be a very good lens. But have the optics improved to a point that the cheaper 18-35 or newer 16-35 are actually better performers or does the 17-35 still easily hold it's own in such company, I wonder?

i think the 17-35/2.8D would be perfectly fine on the D800/D810.. in fact the intent was to use with my IR conversions which are now all D800's and my recent monochrome sensor conversion is a D800... when the weather gets better and the foliage comes back to the Northeast i will try and compare all of them with the 17-35/2.8D.

back in the day.. all my IR conversions were D200/D300s cams.

i haven't tried the new 16-35/4G
Robert L Friedman, Massachusetts, USA
www.pbase.com/bobfriedman

Bjørn Rørslett

  • Fierce Bear of the North
  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 8252
  • Oslo, Norway
Re: Does The Nikon AF-S 17-35mm Still Cut It?
« Reply #4 on: January 05, 2018, 23:05:13 »
The newer 16-35/4 Nikkor is pretty good in IR and the VR actually appears to be of some value.

Good to see you here on NG, Duncan :D

thirtyfivemill

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • You ARE NikonGear
    • THIRTYFIVEMILL.COM
Re: Does The Nikon AF-S 17-35mm Still Cut It?
« Reply #5 on: January 05, 2018, 23:26:25 »
The newer 16-35/4 Nikkor is pretty good in IR and the VR actually appears to be of some value.

Good to see you here on NG, Duncan :D

Good evening, Bjorn!! Yes, I did promise when I spoke to you on the phone about a year ago. Things take me a little longer these days!! :)

I have to say the 16-35 does appeal to me but there seems to be some sample variation?

Bjørn Rørslett

  • Fierce Bear of the North
  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 8252
  • Oslo, Norway
Re: Does The Nikon AF-S 17-35mm Still Cut It?
« Reply #6 on: January 05, 2018, 23:59:44 »
Probably. Lots of the modern designs have production tolerances that sometimes bring the final product out of spec. If you purchase from a decent dealer should be no problem getting a replacement, though.

gryphon1911

  • Looking For The Best Light
  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 455
  • Use The Best Light - ANY Light that is available!
    • Best Light Photographic Photographic
Re: Does The Nikon AF-S 17-35mm Still Cut It?
« Reply #7 on: January 06, 2018, 00:03:20 »
If you don't mind non-Nikon brand lenses, you might also want to consider the Tokina 16-28/2.8 and the Tamron 15-30/2.8 VC.

KEH has the Tokina right now for a bit over $500USD.
Andrew
Nikon Z6/D500/Df Shooter (Various lenses), Olympus PEN-F (Various lenses), Fuji XPro2/X-E3 (various lenses)

thirtyfivemill

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • You ARE NikonGear
    • THIRTYFIVEMILL.COM
Re: Does The Nikon AF-S 17-35mm Still Cut It?
« Reply #8 on: January 06, 2018, 00:14:11 »
Probably. Lots of the modern designs have production tolerances that sometimes bring the final product out of spec. If you purchase from a decent dealer should be no problem getting a replacement, though.

Yes, good point. I'll take another look at that one. Now I thought you'd be firmly on the side of the 17-35mm. As I recall that was your staple wide zoom for many a year?

thirtyfivemill

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • You ARE NikonGear
    • THIRTYFIVEMILL.COM
Re: Does The Nikon AF-S 17-35mm Still Cut It?
« Reply #9 on: January 06, 2018, 00:16:49 »
If you don't mind non-Nikon brand lenses, you might also want to consider the Tokina 16-28/2.8 and the Tamron 15-30/2.8 VC.

KEH has the Tokina right now for a bit over $500USD.

Thanks Andrew. I admit to having always stuck firmly to the Nikons for standard primes and zooms. I've gone off piste fairly often with my macro lenses, which is 90% of what I shoot but with landscape and urban/street I've stuck to Nikon lenses exclusively and may be getting a bit long in the tooth to change now. :)

bobfriedman

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 1263
  • Massachusetts, USA
Re: Does The Nikon AF-S 17-35mm Still Cut It?
« Reply #10 on: January 06, 2018, 00:19:41 »
i'd buy the 17-35/2.8D before i'd buy the non-nikon... especially since it can be had so inexpensively on the used market.
Robert L Friedman, Massachusetts, USA
www.pbase.com/bobfriedman

thirtyfivemill

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • You ARE NikonGear
    • THIRTYFIVEMILL.COM
Re: Does The Nikon AF-S 17-35mm Still Cut It?
« Reply #11 on: January 06, 2018, 01:46:35 »
i'd buy the 17-35/2.8D before i'd buy the non-nikon... especially since it can be had so inexpensively on the used market.

Yep, that would be inclination, too, Bob.

Thomas G

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 2086
  • lumofisk
    • Iceland round trip 2016
Re: Does The Nikon AF-S 17-35mm Still Cut It?
« Reply #12 on: January 06, 2018, 09:58:52 »
I liked the 17-35 on he D700 and continue to do so the Df. It behaves well and predictable and is quite sturdy.
-/-/-

Frank Fremerey

  • engineering art
  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 12623
  • Bonn, Germany
Re: Does The Nikon AF-S 17-35mm Still Cut It?
« Reply #13 on: January 06, 2018, 10:48:44 »
I liked the 17-35 on he D700 and continue to do so the Df. It behaves well and predictable and is quite sturdy.

+1
You are out there. You and your camera. You can shoot or not shoot as you please. Discover the world, Your world. Show it to us. Or we might never see it.

Me: https://youpic.com/photographer/frankfremerey/

John Geerts

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 9394
  • Photojournalist in Tilburg, Netherlands
    • Tilburgers
Re: Does The Nikon AF-S 17-35mm Still Cut It?
« Reply #14 on: January 06, 2018, 18:53:14 »
I liked the 17-35 on he D700 and continue to do so the Df. It behaves well and predictable and is quite sturdy.
I like the 17-35 also on the D600 and D800E