« Last post by Fons Baerken on March 05, 2026, 07:44:54 »
I use the 28mm f/1.4E on the D850 mainly, its awkward by size on the Z camera. I am also interested in the Voigtländer 28mm f/2 apo, the 28/1.5 seem to be prone to misalignment from what i read in reviews There is also a zf 28mm f/2 as an option and of course the z28mm f/2.8!
« Last post by pluton on March 05, 2026, 05:21:22 »
I have yet to ever use the AF-S 28/1.4E, either on D or Z. I've always wanted one, but been hesitant to acquire more F mount lenses, especially large ones. I can recommend the new Voigtlander 28/2 Apo Lanthar if a small but high-performing manual focus 28mm is needed. Also, if you really want character, the first iteration of the 28mm f/3.5 in F, K or Ai versions (with FTZ) is very nice AND small AND lightweight.
« Last post by Wally on March 05, 2026, 02:29:55 »
Here too, I only kept a few F lenses (E: 8-15, 28, 105, and 300) as well as 58/1.4G, 24/1.4G, 200/2G VRII and 24/3.5D PC once transitioning to Z Series.
I love the 28E even more on the Z cameras, cleaner than the AF-S G versions - but still more character than the Z lenses. Not as sterile as the Z 35mm/1.2 but fairly similar rendering if you need to go wider.
« Last post by aerobat on March 04, 2026, 22:43:54 »
Many thanks John for your experience with the 24mm and 28mm. The rendering is a very good point which I'll need to compare to the AF-S 58mm f/1.4. As I already have the Z 24mm f/1.8 I tend to lean towards a 28mm though.
« Last post by John Geerts on March 04, 2026, 22:14:43 »
I use the 28/1.4 E on the Z camera's (and my F camera's) Great lens. Recently I got 24/1.4 G and I like it's output more, because it comes close with the 58/1.4 rendering. The 28/1.4 E is on the clinical side, too perfect, too sharp.
I also prefer the G lens because I can use it on older camera body's which is not really possible with the E lenses.
« Last post by aerobat on March 04, 2026, 21:38:01 »
Interestingly I dumped all my F mount lenses at the Z transition just to later re-buy the AF-S 58mm f/1.4 and the AF-S 300mm PF. Now I think the 28mm f/1.4 would build a phantastic combo with the AF-S 58mm f/1.4. After exchanging with Paco we decided a thread to discuss this very lens could push me over the fence (which isn't that high with the current USD 600.- rebate B&H are offering )
I own one or maybe two 35/2.0 AIS Nikkors. I consider it a very good lens for the era. I printed for a PR photographer that use this lens almost exclusively. Always excellent focus. Always at f/5.6 with a Vivitar 283 at 60* bounce. I showed him a photo of Jimmy Carter's official photographer using a Vivitar 283 or 285 at 90* and a 3x5" index card for fill. He never used a fill card. Now they are built in many Nikon speedlights. In doors the light from the 283 spilled onto the wall near the ceiling and I cropped it off.
I probably owned the early single coated 35/2.0 but don't remember. I sold completely out of Nikon when Pentax announced multi-coating and bought back into Nikon when they released the F2As and AI Nikkors. I recommend the AIS version. I always wanted to add a 35/1.4 AIS but never did.