Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Lens Talk / Re: The Voigtlander 65mm-APO Z lens Compared
« Last post by Michael Erlewine on Today at 09:40:04 »
I don't have the IRIX 150 f/2.8 Macro. Sorry. I am doing most of my work at this point on the Hasselblad X2D Mark II, which is a very different beast.
2
Wonderful stuff!
Gil, is the second shot "Sheba's Breasts" in the Drakensberg?

No, those are in Eswatini. These are the Inner Horn and Outer Horn, seen just to the left of Cathedral Peak. The sun is peeking through to the right of Cleft Peak on the Lesotho border -- it's actually higher than Cathedral.
3
Agree with all the comments above. Very colourful series, Gil. Lovely photos and very clean.
4
Hi Michael.
As a landscape, wildlife and product photographer with an obsession with image sharpness and detil ssince I often print large, I currently shoot my macro and product work with the IRIX 150 f/2.8 Macro lens (Z mount). While it is quite sharp, I've lately heard positive things about the stellar sharpness of the Voigtlander 65 f/2.8 APO-LANTAR Macro lens for Nikon Z mount. So, I see you rate the Voigtlander as being sharper than the Nikkor MC 105 Z lens. Do you also think that it is sharper than the IRIX 150 f/2.8 Macro? Thank you very much! Happy Holidays,
Steve
P.S. - For reference, I attached a Focus Stack Macro using that Z8 and IRIX 150 f/2.8 Macro.
5
Lens Talk / Re: Nikon 1 and D-mount and C-mount lenses
« Last post by kooris10 on Today at 00:19:38 »
hi all,I just got j1,c-mount mf lens,j1 cannot peak focus and mag view...
it seems the go to chip is the only workaround except the ugly ft1.
I use a slim c-n1 adapter to mount lens.
6
Your Weekly Blog / Re: December 2025
« Last post by golunvolo on December 27, 2025, 23:19:24 »
The very south of Europe and North Africa, one of my favourite places.

  D5, 28mm 1.4e
7
Your Weekly Blog / Re: December 2025
« Last post by John Geerts on December 27, 2025, 20:16:37 »
A sunny morning

Zf 50/1.8S
8
What the Nerds Do / Re: Nikkor 10.5mm f/2.8 - 62mm filter threads modified
« Last post by toups on December 27, 2025, 19:12:06 »
Yes looks like I need to add a ring without adding friction.  Need it to be a bit thinner than the existing petal ring in order for the hood/cap male threads to clear whatever ring I may add.  Unfortunately, the press fit is too good (too tight) so won't try to remove the ring on the lens although I would have liked it be a millimeter or two higher.  Thanks for the warnings.  From a quick test with a shim, it was clear there is no room between the lens hood and the felt seal.  I do have the petals on enough of a ring that I could cut a ring from that. 
9
People, Portraits, Street, PJ & Cityscapes / Re: A Merry Christmas in Cape Town
« Last post by Erik Lund on December 27, 2025, 19:03:28 »
Absolutely captivating images! Very powerful and colorful series.
Framing, subject and processing pleasing and effective.
Thank you for sharing
10
What the Nerds Do / Re: Nikkor 10.5mm f/2.8 - 62mm filter threads modified
« Last post by Erik Lund on December 27, 2025, 18:50:34 »
For the auto focus to work the fit must be frictionless or close to. Otherwise there will be strain on the gears that are not meant to bee.
There is no space for anything between the felt seal and the lens hood tube.
Also the front element group will bee loose to rattle around.

Yes you have raised a warning.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10