Author Topic: Portraits of Camera gear.  (Read 80907 times)

rosko

  • Homo erectus manualfocus
  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 1317
  • France/Uk
Re: Portraits of Camera gear.
« Reply #75 on: March 12, 2016, 21:08:32 »
I don't think i've seen one of a FM3a. Here's mine, naked.

It looks like the Df.

Perhaps the FM3 inspired Df designers...::) :)
Francis Devrainne

Bjørn Rørslett

  • Fierce Bear of the North
  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 8252
  • Oslo, Norway
Re: Portraits of Camera gear.
« Reply #76 on: March 12, 2016, 21:13:10 »
One of my UV-Nikkors mounted on a Nikon D100. I initially had high hopes for this camera for UV, but quickly abandoned these after some test shots.

null

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 162
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: Portraits of Camera gear.
« Reply #77 on: March 12, 2016, 21:48:35 »
J-3Plus, Optimized for Each by fiftyonepointsix, on Flickr

One for each, M9 and M Monochrom with J-3+ lenses. I put one layer of mylar tape on the RF cam of the J-3+ on the M Monochrom to optimize for deep-yellow/orange filters. Color filters produce a shift towards infinity, using a thin tape corrects for the back-focus.

null

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 162
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: Portraits of Camera gear.
« Reply #78 on: March 12, 2016, 21:54:12 »
M8 vs M9 by fiftyonepointsix, on Flickr

Two Leicas, Three Sonnars by fiftyonepointsix, on Flickr

My Leicas usually have Sonnars on them.

Chip Chipowski

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 369
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: Portraits of Camera gear.
« Reply #79 on: March 13, 2016, 06:29:50 »
My new-to-me M645

pluton

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 2687
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: Portraits of Camera gear.
« Reply #80 on: March 13, 2016, 07:51:44 »
Here's an old camera that by it's appearance and design, makes you NOT want to use it...or clean it.  Dig the tiny finder holes.
Keith B., Santa Monica, CA, USA

Bjørn Rørslett

  • Fierce Bear of the North
  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 8252
  • Oslo, Norway
Re: Portraits of Camera gear.
« Reply #81 on: March 13, 2016, 11:14:45 »
Keith: I have this urge to sneeze ...

Bjørn Rørslett

  • Fierce Bear of the North
  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 8252
  • Oslo, Norway
Re: Portraits of Camera gear.
« Reply #82 on: March 13, 2016, 11:18:39 »
A rewind to film-based UV photography. The F4 loaded with Fuji RTP film combined with the UV-Nikkor 105 mm f/4.5 lens, Nikon FF filter in a hinged AF-1 mount, and the SB-140 flash formed the base foundation for my UV photography during the early '90s.

Decades later, I still use the same UV-Nikkor lens and SB-140 flash, so these were made to standards almost unheard of today. Food for thought, perhaps.

null

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 162
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: Portraits of Camera gear.
« Reply #83 on: March 13, 2016, 14:01:21 »
Here's an old camera that by it's appearance and design, makes you NOT want to use it...or clean it.  Dig the tiny finder holes.

I had one of these like-new, in a box. Went for a good price to someone in Japan. The lens makes you want to use it. The "Anastigmat Special" is an "Ektar" lens. Kodak lenses marked "Ektar" are good. I should look for a broken camera to convert the lens to Leica mount.

Eddie Draaisma

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 419
Re: Portraits of Camera gear.
« Reply #84 on: March 13, 2016, 14:25:49 »
.

Andy

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 314
Re: Portraits of Camera gear.
« Reply #85 on: March 13, 2016, 15:11:03 »
From the early days of the D family - reunion at the 12th anniversary of the D1
https://nikonandye.wordpress.com/TheNikonDFamily/



rgds,
Andy


null

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 162
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: Portraits of Camera gear.
« Reply #86 on: March 14, 2016, 22:02:06 »
Nikkor_28_F35 by fiftyonepointsix, on Flickr

This lens is very good, especially on the Monochrom.

Erik Lund

  • Global Moderator
  • **
  • Posts: 6529
  • Copenhagen
    • ErikLund.com
Re: Portraits of Camera gear.
« Reply #87 on: March 15, 2016, 18:38:54 »
Andy that's pretty overwhelming with all of those D's  ;)
Erik Lund

Chip Chipowski

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 369
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: Portraits of Camera gear.
« Reply #88 on: March 15, 2016, 18:45:50 »
Can anyone tell me why Nikon phased out that little white balance dealie on top of the viewfinder in the D2 series?  I think it was also on the F4  I assume it was for white balance, but I don't know for sure.  Seems like a cool idea, so I wonder if they figured out a better way or what?

Erik Lund

  • Global Moderator
  • **
  • Posts: 6529
  • Copenhagen
    • ErikLund.com
Re: Portraits of Camera gear.
« Reply #89 on: March 15, 2016, 19:43:23 »
Yes it was WB - The internal light-meter sensor went up in mega pixels later on D3
Erik Lund