[Theme] Do you have a stitched photo?

[golunvolo]

David!!!    Amazing image. Humbling. Thanks


   This is a view of "La Alhambra" taking tonight. From Mirador de San Nicolás, a very popular touristic view point in Granada. Taken with d700, 105mm 2.5 pre-ai and a manfrotto fluid video head.


   
 

[Thomas G]

Fjällbacka, Sweden

[Jakov Minić]

If we ever get to Seville and ThomasG doesn't join I will be very disappointed 

[golunvolo]

Fjällbacka, Sweden

  So this is that dangerous place from Camilla Läckberg´s books? 

   Thanks for sharing Thomas

[Thomas G]

If we ever get to Seville and ThomasG doesn't join I will be very disappointed 

We'll see. For now I feel welcome... Thank's, Jakov.

  So this is that dangerous place from Camilla Läckberg´s books? 
   Thanks for sharing Thomas

Your are welcome, Paco. Yes, it's her place. Walking around there gives you ideas. Isn't she born from the very same place?

[golunvolo]

Either born or raise. I remember her saying that knowing the place was the main reason to locate the stories there.

[Akira]

One of my first vertical stitch using the image files from GH5.  The on-screen level in EVF helps minimize the wasted peripherals of the initial stitched image file yielded from Photomerge, which enables the vertically wider view angle of the final trimmed image like the one posted here (6 stitches).   

[simato73]

One from the weekend before last, in a location that I am visiting often lately.

[simato73]

And another from the same valley, opposite side, a week later...

[Thomas G]

Zollverein, Unesco World Heritage site, city of Essen, Germany.

[Akira]

Shot in the morning following heavy (for Tokyo!) snowfall at night.  5-stitch pano.

[MFloyd]

I have always have a claustrophobic feeling when I'm viewing very stretched panoramic views (I guess, my "letterbox" syndrom).  For me, a second layer (at least) of vertical stitches is desirable.

[Akira]

I have always have a claustrophobic feeling when I'm viewing very stretched panoramic views (I guess, my "letterbox" syndrom).  For me, a second layer (at least) of vertical stitches is needed.

Christian, I understand and share your feelings.  I think a panoramic image is intended for a very large print, and even the largest computer screen available is not large enough to suit its original need.

My latest pano was stitched from five vertical frames to make the result as tall as possible.  I know it is not enough for the PC screens.

[Lorne]

I have always have a claustrophobic feeling when I'm viewing very stretched panoramic views (I guess, my "letterbox" syndrom).  For me, a second layer (at least) of vertical stitches is desirable.

I don't believe that the number of layers/rows, or indeed the number of photos used is important. You could just crop any single image as a very wide pano. What matters is the aspect ratio of the final result, usually less than 2.75:1. But it depends on the subject, the physical size, and distance from the viewer.

But definitely, an overly wide pano suffers when viewed on a smallish computer screen.

[Lorne]

Every once in a while I peruse the Project Apollo Flickr feed looking for panorama possibilities. On the moon during Apollo 17, 70mm Hasselblad cameras were fixed to the astronaut's suits. Amazing as they can be, I think they look better when stitched together as panoramas. The scans are high resolution jpegs but of uneven brightness, even for nearly identical shots. I didn't have much luck stitching with Autopano 4.2 os PS CS5 and resorted to blending them by hand in CS5. Btw, the file names refer to the magazine number scheme used at Flickr.