Author Topic: !DAILY UPDATES! September. 366 days: your 2016 in photographs  (Read 65858 times)

kruemmelkasper

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: !DAILY UPDATES! September. 366 days: your 2016 in photographs
« Reply #180 on: September 16, 2016, 02:01:48 »

Chip Chipowski

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 380
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: !DAILY UPDATES! September. 366 days: your 2016 in photographs
« Reply #181 on: September 16, 2016, 04:12:28 »
D200 IR w/ 55mm f/3.5

armando_m

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 3730
  • Guadalajara México
    • http://armando-m.smugmug.com/
Re: !DAILY UPDATES! September. 366 days: your 2016 in photographs
« Reply #182 on: September 16, 2016, 05:15:36 »
At the fair
Armando Morales
D800, Nikon 1 V1, Fuji X-T3

Frank Fremerey

  • engineering art
  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 12944
  • Bonn, Germany
Re: !DAILY UPDATES! September. 366 days: your 2016 in photographs
« Reply #183 on: September 16, 2016, 10:27:28 »
Armando. Amazing Colors!

Chip. Moody backlit monochromes!
Ego autem dico vobis: diligite inimicos vestros

Fons Baerken

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 11686
    • https://www.flickr.com/photos/fonsbaerken/
Re: !DAILY UPDATES! September. 366 days: your 2016 in photographs
« Reply #184 on: September 16, 2016, 11:27:24 »
september 16



1 V1 voigtlander 90/3.5

handheld applied noise reduction twice

once within PN second with niks define within PS



24/1.4



45/2.8

a bit of freelensing here since the FT1 adapter doesnt allow the 45p to mount


Fons Baerken

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 11686
    • https://www.flickr.com/photos/fonsbaerken/
Re: !DAILY UPDATES! September. 366 days: your 2016 in photographs
« Reply #185 on: September 16, 2016, 11:44:29 »


simple setup

Df 45/p



something different

Df voigtlander 20/3.5

John Geerts

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 9733
  • Photojournalist in Tilburg, Netherlands
    • Tilburgers
Re: !DAILY UPDATES! September. 366 days: your 2016 in photographs
« Reply #186 on: September 16, 2016, 13:02:03 »
Amazing movement and colours, Armando ! 

Experimenting, Fons?

I Noticed something....   ;)

September 8th and September 15th






Fons Baerken

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 11686
    • https://www.flickr.com/photos/fonsbaerken/
Re: !DAILY UPDATES! September. 366 days: your 2016 in photographs
« Reply #187 on: September 16, 2016, 13:12:11 »
bike hasnt been moved, what do you expect they must have nicked the wheels ;)

Fons Baerken

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 11686
    • https://www.flickr.com/photos/fonsbaerken/
Re: !DAILY UPDATES! September. 366 days: your 2016 in photographs
« Reply #188 on: September 16, 2016, 13:25:54 »
Quote
Experimenting, Fons?





D800 45/2.8p fitted with the diopter of the cv90/3.5

bleeding colours from dirty elements and reflections,
anyway..

John Geerts

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 9733
  • Photojournalist in Tilburg, Netherlands
    • Tilburgers
Re: !DAILY UPDATES! September. 366 days: your 2016 in photographs
« Reply #189 on: September 16, 2016, 13:29:37 »
bike hasnt been moved, what do you expect they must have nicked the wheels ;)
;D

September 16th 2016  Cloudy and a lot colder


Lost a wheel but gained a saddle...

Nikkor 20/3.5 UD wide open

John Geerts

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 9733
  • Photojournalist in Tilburg, Netherlands
    • Tilburgers
Re: !DAILY UPDATES! September. 366 days: your 2016 in photographs
« Reply #190 on: September 16, 2016, 13:33:40 »
Dirty elements?

Fons Baerken

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 11686
    • https://www.flickr.com/photos/fonsbaerken/
Re: !DAILY UPDATES! September. 366 days: your 2016 in photographs
« Reply #191 on: September 16, 2016, 13:38:51 »
the diopter appears a bit smudged from fingerprint, gee

the solitaire

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 624
Re: !DAILY UPDATES! September. 366 days: your 2016 in photographs
« Reply #192 on: September 16, 2016, 14:20:03 »
Not sure about the Voigt, but I had the Nikkor  20/3.5 AI, 20/4  AI and the 20/2.8 AIS and for me the UD is the clear winner with regard to colour, bokeh, distant, has less distortion and is therefore useful for a lot of applications and subjects.  But these are of course personal preferences.  perhaps Buddy has experiences with the other lenses?

I completely missed this post. Will try to make good on that now.

In a non-scientifical comparison between the 20mm f3,5, the 20mm f4, the 20mm f2,8 Ai-S and the 20mm f3,5 Nikkor-UD the results showed that between the copies tested:

The 20mm f3,5 Nikkor-UD has the highest centerresolution and sharpness
The 20mm f3,5 Ai has the highest flare resistance
The 20mm f2,8 Ai-S has the highest corner sharpness

The focal plane of the 20mm f3,5 Nikkor-UD is strongly curved. When used well you can get images with a sharp foreground, a sharp subject and sharp corners wide open.

The 20mm f3,5 Nikkor-UD has light falloff towards the corners, but less then the 20mm f3,5 Ai and the 20mm f4 Ai and less then the 20mm f3,5 Voigtlander.

The voigtlander comes closest to the performance of the 20mm f2,8 with the exception that it suffers more from CA and has quite a color cast towardswarm/red/orange.

The 20mm f3,5 and 20mm f4 Ai suffer strongest from barrel distortion. I believe the 20mm f2,8 Ai-S was slightly ahead of the 20mm f3,5 Nikkor-UD in this regard. The Voigtlander 20mm f3,5 is quite bad in barrel distortion as well.

Now on to first hand experience, I owned the 14-24 f2,8 AF-S zoom Nikkor. Bought the 20mm f3,5 Nikkor-UD to save space when I didn't need 14mm and here are my personal findings:

The 14-24mm f2,8 AF-S Zoom Nikkor is better from 14-19mm and better again from 21-24mm. It also performs better then the UD Nikkor between f2,8 and f3,4.
But at 20mm and f3,5 it only beats the UD Nikkor in light falloff.

I couldn't find any flaws in regards to sharpness in the UD Nikkor on the 36 Mpix D800. The center is sharp and the lens appears to outresolve the D800 sensor there with ease.

Stopping down does little to increase the center sharpness. But stopped down to f8 the edges and corners sharpen up considerably.

After 6 months of using the UD Nikkor I sold my 14-24mm zoom. The one wide angle Nikkor that positively appears sharper then the UD Nikkor (sharper then sharp) is the 16mm f3,5 Fisheye Nikkor.
Buddy

John Geerts

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 9733
  • Photojournalist in Tilburg, Netherlands
    • Tilburgers
Re: !DAILY UPDATES! September. 366 days: your 2016 in photographs
« Reply #193 on: September 16, 2016, 15:31:58 »
Thanks for the clarification, Buddy.

I couldn't find any flaws in regards to sharpness in the UD Nikkor on the 36 Mpix D800. The center is sharp and the lens appears to outresolve the D800 sensor there with ease.
Yes. The 36mp files with the UD are amazing.
The 17-35 comes close with comparable sharpness but it has an ugly distortion at 20mm with soft corners as well.  The rendering of the UD is sweeter and the colours are better (and bokeh).

Fons Baerken

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 11686
    • https://www.flickr.com/photos/fonsbaerken/
Re: !DAILY UPDATES! September. 366 days: your 2016 in photographs
« Reply #194 on: September 16, 2016, 15:42:08 »
Thanks Bud for the explanations, remains the 20/1.8g for the equation.
i have to be happy with the voigt 20/3.5, nikkors 20/1.8g, 17-35/2.8 and 14-24/2.8 (or the 18/4). ;D