Yes, I fully realize I need a better tripod, but I also must have a geared head - non-geared ball heads, gimbals, etc. are not an option for what I do.
My current 405 geared head is clearly where most of the flexure in the system I currently have - makes no sense to get a much heavier tripod and not fix the geared head issue and vice versa.
Thus, as the post title says, I just want to talk about geared heads and not tripods at the moment.
Some have suggested I not use a leveling base, but that's typically not an option either as I need to rotate about a pretty vertical axis and using the tripod legs to achieve accurate leveling is typically impractical. I currently use a 438 Manfrotto leveling base, but if someone has a suggestion for a better leveling base I'm all ears.
I also indicated I only extend the center column when I have no other choice, which is rare and clearly is very prone to low frequency low damping oscillations, but sometimes that 5 ft. fence is just in the way!
Based on the on-point responses my options for a geared head system seem limited and expensive, which just may be what I have to suck up and purchase due to lack of options. Folks in other forums have suggested I look at heavy duty geared alt azimuth telescope heads as they may be more suitable for my needs, though they may be quite heavy - fortunately I don't have to lug my gear that far.
I do in fact own a medium duty alt azimuth mount that does well with a 1,000mm Mak, but have not used it due to needing plate adapters, etc., but I may give that a try. The matching tripod is unbelievably heavy and stiff and not practical to transport.
Thanks!
john
