Exactly my point! Technology keeps improving at an incredible rate, but 99,5% of the end use results are covered by a clear margin, with 10 year old technology. My pictures are viewed by most people on a SRGB screen with limited resolution or end up with 10x15 prints in my album. I have sold prints up to 60x40cm with 12 mp cameras, had rollups made by cropped files from 10 mp cameras, several meters in size. Most of the time I stich photos together with a software if I need a high resolution file of scene. If I ask the client what kind of size, file type and color space they want, they usually dont have a clue. Professional print services sometimes have a limit for file size wich they can download. On several occasions I have had to physically hand them a memory stick with the files, because of email restrictions on attachment size. Most people dont have broadband internet service. Photographers care about such things, but they are never clients. Clients dont know squat about these things, all they care about is the picture. On the other hand, me as a photographer, love high resolution, acutance of detail and lack of distortion. I pride my self to deliver the best possible work I can achieve and waste hours of my life behind a computer screen on details, no one will ever notice. I guess I'm the one who walks willingly into the trap laid out of the nikon marketing people
End of rant and off topic
