Author Topic: Nikon, why no "Monochrome" digital camera?  (Read 31 times)

BruceSD

  • Confirmed Bokeholic
  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 271
  • I'm here to learn from the best
    • The F/2 Guru
Nikon, why no "Monochrome" digital camera?
« on: November 21, 2025, 23:46:12 »
.
I still love black and white prints.  Like most of you, back in the day I had a black and white analog dark room and exclusively printed black and white.

I currently own over 40 digital cameras, but none of them are dedicated monochrome bodies, until now...

Leica makes a number of full frame "Monochrom" cameras.  The are expensive running $4,000 USD to around $10,000 USD.

About a year ago, Pentax came out with a Monochrome APS-C DSLR camera body.  I finally decided to purchase one, it is scheduled to arrive tomorrow.  It costs $2,200 USD new; mine is an "open box" copy I bought from Amazon.com for $1,600 USD.  While still expensive, it is much more affordable than one of the Leica "Monochrom's".

I'm greatly looking forward to learning how to use my new B&W body.  I've got 6 or 7 colored filters all ready to try out.  Also plan to try IR filters and polarizing filters too.   Initially, I'll be shooting:  Zeiss ZF 25/2.8, Pentax 28/2.8 shift, Leica 50/2 Summicron R, the Pentax 77/1.9 limited (voted Pentax' best lens), and a Pentax 50-135mm zoom lens.  Should be lots of fun!

Why does Nikon not make a monochrome camera?  Do you think they ever will?  If Nikon did make a monochrome camera, would you buy one?
.