Author Topic: Acutance and the Pentax K1  (Read 6112 times)

Bjørn Rørslett

  • Fierce Bear of the North
  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 8252
  • Oslo, Norway
Re: Acutance and the Pentax K1
« Reply #15 on: July 10, 2016, 13:34:51 »
Bayer interpolation is a controlled "smear" (not certain this concept applies here) in the chrominance domain. It does little to the apparent sharpness as such.  Pixel shifting influences both aspects. Not necessarily in an adverse manner, though.

If the K-1 can turn off pixel shifting, producing images of the identical subject with or without the feature enabled could answer some question. No focus stacking, please.

Michael Erlewine

  • Close-Up Photographer
  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 2067
  • Close-Up with APO
    • Spirit Grooves
Re: Acutance and the Pentax K1
« Reply #16 on: July 10, 2016, 13:41:51 »
Bayer interpolation is a controlled "smear" (not certain this concept applies here) in the chrominance domain. It does little to the apparent sharpness as such.  Pixel shifting influences both aspects.

If the K-1 can turn off pixel shifting, producing images of the identical subject with or without the feature enabled could answer some question. No focus stacking, please.

Pixel-Shift on the K1 is optional. You turn it on or off... if OFF, you get a 36 Mpx image, like on the D810. Let me know exactly what you want and I will take shots, but I may not be able to do it today, but I may have time. I am interested. I can assure you that at full res, pixel-shift is sharper (or something) than any other camera/lens I have used.
MichaelErlewine.smugmug.com, Daily Blog at https://www.facebook.com/MichaelErlewine. main site: SpiritGrooves.net, https://www.youtube.com/user/merlewine, Founder: MacroStop.com, All-Music Guide, All-Movie Guide, Classic Posters.com, Matrix Software, DharmaGrooves.com

Bjørn Rørslett

  • Fierce Bear of the North
  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 8252
  • Oslo, Norway
Re: Acutance and the Pentax K1
« Reply #17 on: July 10, 2016, 14:01:04 »
I'm not a believer, I'm an observer.

Take 2 separate frames of three subjects (or same subject, but different parts of it) with each option (pixel shift either On or OFF). That'll be 12 frames all together. Same lens, aperture, exposure, tripod, etc. on each frame. Put the RAW files in a Dropbox so I can access and download them. No need to hurry, my summer schedule is crammed full enough!!

Michael Erlewine

  • Close-Up Photographer
  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 2067
  • Close-Up with APO
    • Spirit Grooves
Re: Acutance and the Pentax K1
« Reply #18 on: July 10, 2016, 14:10:05 »
I'm not a believer, I'm an observer.

Take 2 separate frames of three subjects (or same subject, but different parts of it) with each option (pixel shift either On or OFF). That'll be 12 frames all together. Same lens, aperture, exposure, tripod, etc. on each frame. Put the RAW files in a Dropbox so I can access and download them. No need to hurry, my summer schedule is crammed full enough!!

so, 2 frames, one with Pixel-Shift on and one with it off.... of three subjects...so: 3 subjects x 2 = 6. What am I missing?
MichaelErlewine.smugmug.com, Daily Blog at https://www.facebook.com/MichaelErlewine. main site: SpiritGrooves.net, https://www.youtube.com/user/merlewine, Founder: MacroStop.com, All-Music Guide, All-Movie Guide, Classic Posters.com, Matrix Software, DharmaGrooves.com

Bjørn Rørslett

  • Fierce Bear of the North
  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 8252
  • Oslo, Norway
Re: Acutance and the Pentax K1
« Reply #19 on: July 10, 2016, 14:13:32 »
I said 2 frames each, meaning you take each alternative 2 times. Thus 2 * 2 * 3 = 12.