« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: What the heck are we looking at here?  (Read 1496 times)

Snoogly

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 638
  • Flipping the bird
What the heck are we looking at here?
« on: March 14, 2021, 22:48:32 »
Logged
***************
Richard Hawking (not Richard Haw!), in Tokyo

MEPER

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 1179
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: What the heck are we looking at here?
« Reply #1 on: March 14, 2021, 22:56:45 »
A 500/8 and 1000/11 mirror lens, a 135/2.8, and then two 300mm lenses...and old Nikkor-H probably and a more modern with IF and ED-glass......would be my best guess......
They look to be in a very good condition :-)
Logged

Akira

  • Homo jezoensis
  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 12840
  • Tokyo, Japan
Re: What the heck are we looking at here?
« Reply #2 on: March 14, 2021, 22:59:13 »
The price for the whole set seems to be fair.  I would only be interested in the 1000mm Reflex Nikkor, but I think that mirror lenses are more tricky to assess the condition than refractive optics.
Logged
"The eye is blind if the mind is absent." - Confucius

"Limitation is inspiration." - Akira

Snoogly

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 638
  • Flipping the bird
Re: What the heck are we looking at here?
« Reply #3 on: March 14, 2021, 23:00:43 »
I don’t really want or need any of them, but that’s about $1,100 for the lot. I think the ad is nearing the time limit, and the seller didn’t reply when I asked for a list of lenses ...

If I bought them .... they would need cleaning and servicing! A nice project for Richard H?  ;)
Logged
***************
Richard Hawking (not Richard Haw!), in Tokyo

Dr Klaus Schmitt

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1005
Re: What the heck are we looking at here?
« Reply #4 on: March 14, 2021, 23:07:52 »
Careful: CRAIGLIST is known to be a place for fake ads and ripoff...
Logged
formerly known as kds315

Snoogly

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 638
  • Flipping the bird
Re: What the heck are we looking at here?
« Reply #5 on: March 14, 2021, 23:20:43 »
Quote from: Dr Klaus Schmitt on March 14, 2021, 23:07:52
Careful: CRAIGLIST is known to be a place for fake ads and ripoff...

Indeed! I was just poking around there.

This aberration is also in the Tokyo list. I want to believe this IS a fake!

A candidate for blackboard paint ...

 
Logged
***************
Richard Hawking (not Richard Haw!), in Tokyo

Akira

  • Homo jezoensis
  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 12840
  • Tokyo, Japan
Re: What the heck are we looking at here?
« Reply #6 on: March 14, 2021, 23:28:26 »
I've never known that CRAIGLIST has become such an international platform.   :o
Logged
"The eye is blind if the mind is absent." - Confucius

"Limitation is inspiration." - Akira

mxbianco

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 931
  • A teddy bear from the Alps, rarely fierce
Re: What the heck are we looking at here?
« Reply #7 on: March 15, 2021, 05:12:19 »
Quote from: Snoogly on March 14, 2021, 22:48:32
A truly terrible for sale ad, but what are the lenses?  ???

https://tokyo.craigslist.org/pho/d/nikon-vintage-cameras-and-film-lenses/7270430416.html?lang=en&cc=us
About the two Reflex-Nikkors:
the 1000mm/11 is an early version (1968?), the one with a filter turret (pretty useless if used on digital cameras). I have a recent version of this one (1977, no filter turret)

the 500mm/8 is also an early version (1968), optically less performing than the 500mm/8 N. Lots of vignetting, can be used successfully on a DX camera where vignetting is mitigated. I have two of these, one similar to this one (1973), and one of the more recent ones (1992). The performance gap is substantial (price too!). The N version has a very useful close focusing distance of 1.5 m (vs 4 meters for the old version), can be used to approach shy animals.

Ciao from Massimo
Logged
Since evolution has given us TWO ears and ONE mouth, we are supposed (me included) to be doing more listening than talking.

Snoogly

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 638
  • Flipping the bird
Re: What the heck are we looking at here?
« Reply #8 on: March 15, 2021, 05:57:51 »
Quote from: mxbianco on March 15, 2021, 05:12:19
About the two Reflex-Nikkors:
the 1000mm/11 is an early version (1968?), the one with a filter turret (pretty useless if used on digital cameras). I have a recent version of this one (1977, no filter turret)

the 500mm/8 is also an early version (1968), optically less performing than the 500mm/8 N. Lots of vignetting, can be used successfully on a DX camera where vignetting is mitigated. I have two of these, one similar to this one (1973), and one of the more recent ones (1992). The performance gap is substantial (price too!). The N version has a very useful close focusing distance of 1.5 m (vs 4 meters for the old version), can be used to approach shy animals.

Ciao from Massimo

Thanks for that. So I guess they are really only of interest to collectors.
Logged
***************
Richard Hawking (not Richard Haw!), in Tokyo

mxbianco

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 931
  • A teddy bear from the Alps, rarely fierce
Re: What the heck are we looking at here?
« Reply #9 on: March 15, 2021, 06:37:35 »
The ad is also inaccurate in the description of motor drives: there is a MD1-MB1 combo for Nilon F2, an MD-4 (for F3, they got this one right!), and they will have two finders for the Nikon F: an eyelevel plain prism finder and a waist level finder (late model, with the big F on top)

 Ciao from Massimo
Logged
Since evolution has given us TWO ears and ONE mouth, we are supposed (me included) to be doing more listening than talking.

Peter

  • "Remember You can only use one eye at a time"
  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 143
  • Los Alamos, New Mexico
Re: What the heck are we looking at here?
« Reply #10 on: March 15, 2021, 19:02:43 »
135mm f2.8 Q Nikkor's go for dirt these days, good glass have two.. The ED 300mm is in good shape had one didn't care much for the balance of it.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »