Hmm, since it is not in Critique section I can not be sure if any critique would be welcome here, but the conversation here is rather interesting.
It looks like photographers with experience of shooting street see street shots quite differently compared to other folks. I know that Lew treats street photography with respect and expects certain standard. Others may accept it as a "slice of life" or a "window into the world" and be happy to see "stuff" and find that "something is going on".
Almost any random street shot is a slice of life, a window into the world, and in most cases there is something going on. There are always some legs and heads and buses, pavement is almost guaranteed, and you can find a lot of other stuff if you are hard pressed. So to me, as another street shooter, it all means nothing, absolutely nothing. It is like looking at a chair in a furniture shop saying: "Look, there is some wood, and fabric, and also nails, and it has paint on it, so why don't we buy this chair?".