Current status: 94/150 supporters
January 11Vegetablesd850 35mm f/1.4ai
Yes, it is cheaper to tear a building down. Much cheaper.First all the asbest-removal, and also all the chemical waste (Oil- Gasoline- etc as a consequence of the locomotive maintenance during 80 years)Yes Akira, no earthquake cost here. Which results in an easier way for reconstruction.Heating consists of a pumpsystem and includes a Ground-coupled heat exchanger with solar panels as an addition. For this purpose the enormous space is divided into four compartiments. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground-coupled_heat_exchangerSome linksArchitectoral design: https://www.mecanoo.nl/Projects/project/221/LocHalArchitect: http://www.braaksma-roos.nl/project/lochal-tilburg/
very beautiful colors. A view I enjoy every day because I cook.
Pawn shopD850 Irix 15/2.4 at Close Focus
what if I posted something?
I like this, Frank! The stroke of a light brush makes this otherwise serene morning scene surreal.