Author Topic: Reality check  (Read 3049 times)

Peter Connan

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 988
  • You ARE NikonGear
Reality check
« on: July 23, 2015, 17:18:33 »
These are both radio-controlled models. The intention was to make the larger one look real.

Any tips on how to do it better next time?

Jakov Minić

  • Jakov Minic
  • Global Moderator
  • **
  • Posts: 5354
  • The Hague, The Netherlands
    • Jakov Minić
Re: Reality check
« Reply #1 on: July 23, 2015, 17:30:48 »
Peter, the image is cool as is!

Since you asked, here it goes:

Perhaps you could improve if you were to put some air between the two planes so that they are more distinct.
Perhaps you could move back a km or two and use you 500/4 to blur the background.
Perhaps you could move in closer with a fish-eye to make it funkier.
Perhaps you can stand in between the two planes and create a 360 panorama with a fish-eye.
Perhaps you can use that 360 degree panorama to create a planet :)

I cannot think of any other tips at the moment  :D
Free your mind and your ass will follow. - George Clinton
Before I jump like monkey give me banana. - Fela Kuti
Confidence is what you have before you understand the problem. - Woody Allen

Sash

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 158
  • From behind the Irony Curtain
Re: Reality check
« Reply #2 on: July 23, 2015, 17:33:08 »
You tricked me. I did think one was real.
Alexander

Peter Connan

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 988
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: Reality check
« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2015, 17:54:50 »
 :D Thanks Jakov

And Sash

Jan Anne

  • Noob
  • Global Moderator
  • **
  • Posts: 2045
  • Holland
    • Me on Flickr
Re: Reality check
« Reply #4 on: July 23, 2015, 18:30:34 »
Just shoot the bigger model with a wide-angle, get as close as possible from a low angle perspective and have real looking people do something in the background, the wide-angle will make the people appear smaller than they really are making the plane look bigger.
Cheers,
Jan Anne

Mike G

  • Guest
Re: Reality check
« Reply #5 on: July 23, 2015, 18:38:09 »
I'm with Sash you fooled me, I too thought the large one was real

pluton

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 2687
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: Reality check
« Reply #6 on: July 23, 2015, 19:40:04 »
Except for the presence of the smaller, more obviously fake model, I'd have 'bought it'...at least in a quick look.
Aside from getting rid of the smaller model, I like Jan Anne's idea of using false perspective.  A few people standing 50 meters back might appear to under the wing of the plane.  Give them flight suits or other paraphernalia.
Also, in post production you could add some aerial perspective(distant haze) to the the background.
Keith B., Santa Monica, CA, USA

Peter Connan

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 988
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: Reality check
« Reply #7 on: July 23, 2015, 20:15:19 »
Thank you Jan, Mike and Pluton. Some great ideas there!

elsa hoffmann

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3822
  • Cape Town, South Africa
    • Elsa Hoffmann
Re: Reality check
« Reply #8 on: July 23, 2015, 21:37:53 »
Boet you fooled me too

Agree in the breathing space between the two models.
"You don’t take a photograph – you make it” – Ansel Adams. Thats why I use photoshop.
www.phototourscapetown.com
www.elsa.co.za. www.intimateimages.co.za

armando_m

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 3681
  • Guadalajara México
    • http://armando-m.smugmug.com/
Re: Reality check
« Reply #9 on: July 23, 2015, 22:36:22 »
 it does look like a runway

and the one in the back looks like the real thing

+1 on a bit more separation
Armando Morales
D800, Nikon 1 V1, Fuji X-T3

Peter Connan

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 988
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: Reality check
« Reply #10 on: July 24, 2015, 05:57:22 »
Thanks Elsa and Armando

Gary

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1867
  • Southern California
    • Snaps
Re: Reality check
« Reply #11 on: July 24, 2015, 06:01:21 »
I'll join the fooled lot.
"Everywhere you look there are photographs, it is the call of photographers to see and capture them."- Gary Ayala
My snaps are here: www.garyayala.com
Critiquing my snaps are always welcomed and appreciated.

Peter Connan

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 988
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: Reality check
« Reply #12 on: July 24, 2015, 06:05:32 »
Thanks Gary

It's incredible the time and money these guys spend. Almost like photographers!

pluton

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 2687
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: Reality check
« Reply #13 on: July 24, 2015, 08:20:49 »
For a complete illusion, you'd have to change the material that shows in the foreground...finer sand, maybe.
You might as well focus stack to get the foreground sharper as well, though I don't know how that works.
Keith B., Santa Monica, CA, USA

Akira

  • Homo jezoensis
  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 12823
  • Tokyo, Japan
Re: Reality check
« Reply #14 on: July 24, 2015, 14:55:14 »
Yet another fooled guy here.  Well done, Peter!
"The eye is blind if the mind is absent." - Confucius

"Limitation is inspiration." - Akira