Current status: 95/150 supporters
I was just reading this post on the Nikkor 55mm f/1.2 and noticed how it gives some insight into the reasons behind the much reduced flange distance of the Z cameras. https://imaging.nikon.com/history/story/0049/index.htmSection I is most informative and comes to a close with a discussion of how the Increased flange distance of the SLR made large diameter lens design more difficult. But lens designers possessed strong desire to commercialize again the f/1.4 and f/1.1-1.2 lenses they had successfully produced for range-finder cameras. Every designer apparently thought it was problematical that the future camera system that made its debut with so much fanfare was actually inferior to the existing system. Also an interesting discussion of why the 50mm”normal” lens is actually 51.6mm. I’d read this article ilong sfo but it becomes interesting again in the new context.
Also an interesting discussion of why the 50mm”normal” lens is actually 51.6mm.
The lack of eye AF...Here's a quick test of the face detection performance (AF-C) with the Sigma 105/1.4 Art. To me the so-called lack of eye AF is perhaps not a big an issues as some want it to be. This model (read: the teenager in the house) would kill me if I didn't edit out a few spots here and there...so there you have it .
Naaah, more like indifferent and impatient. Which is the normal mode for a teenager I guess.
she looks pi**ed...
I did a double-take when I read this comment originally.I guess Akita meant “she looks annoyed, angry etc”In English, when we use this expression it means the person is very obviously under the influence of alcohol (which as many parents will confirm, is entirely possible for a teenager....)
You are right. Does "English" mean British English?
Yes, British English. Also Australian and New Zealand English.In Australia and New Zealand, to mean “she looks annoyed, angry etc” we would say 'pissed off'