Author Topic: Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8E FL VR vs Nikon AF-D 85/1.4, 105 DC, 135 DC, 180/2.8  (Read 14740 times)

Jedi

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 152
  • Let the light be with you!
Good morning, my English isn't perfect, however I would like to try to ask you a council. I have got Nikon D810, Nikon AF-D 85mm f/1.4, Nikon AF-D 105mm f/2 Defocus Control, Nikon AF-D 135mm f/2 Defocus Control, Nikon AF-D 180mm f/2.8, which are old champions for portrait, for their bokeh, their "old style" colours, their high but "not aggressive" sharpness for portrait: we know this aspects, all the members of this forum know them.
They are fixed lens and I'm thinking to buy a zoom for its flexibility and practicality (is this word correct?), but I wouldn't lose the high quality of those prime lenses and I want to buy the zoom, I have to sell those prime lenses. I would like to buy the Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL VR, for my Nikon D810, for portrait and mountain landscapes shoots. 70-200mm FL seems to be extraordinary, very, very, very sharp from edge to edge, also at f/2.8 and its bokeh seems to be wonderful. The weight isn't a problem for me, but the question is: I would lose quality for sharpness (mostly on the corner) and bokeh? To the infinity focus 85mm f/1.4 AF-D isn't good, it is a monster portrait lens, but I have got also the 105mm f/2 DC, which has got a double personality: at f/2 - f/4 is a portrait lens, at f/8 and f/11 is a razor, for landscape, such as the 135mm f/2 DC. My 180mm f/2.8 AF-D, also with Fine tuning AF of my D810 isn't very good for landscape, but is exceptional for portrait and street.
What I have to do? I sell the primes to buy the 70-200mm f/2.8E FL VR, to obtain an only one lens, which I could use for portrait and landscape?

Thank you!!!
Nikon D810 - Zeiss 21/2.8, Zeiss 25/2, Zeiss 28/2, Nikon 28mm f/2 AI, Zeiss 35/1.4, Zeiss 50/1.4, Zeiss M-P 50/2, Zeiss Milvus 50/1.4, Zeiss 85/1.4,  Zeiss M-P 100/2, Nikon 105/2.5 AI, Nikon AF-D 105/2 DC, Zeiss 135/2, Nikon AF-D 135/2 DC, Nikon AF 200/4 Micro Nikkor.

BEZ

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 336
  • RC51
You seem to have mostly answered your own question already?

The 70-200mm would not be a suitable portrait lens for my use. I would consider keeping your favourite portrait lens/lenses, sell the rest, and look to purchase the less expensive 70-200 f4G zoom. What is the problem with your 180mm AF-D for landscape pictures. I am very happy with my copy for landscape use.

Cheers
Bez

Jedi

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 152
  • Let the light be with you!
You seem to have mostly answered your own question already?

The 70-200mm would not be a suitable portrait lens for my use.
Cheers

It's also a portrait lens, in my opinion, see:

https://www.juzaphoto.com/recensione.php?l=it&t=nikon_70-200_f2-8e_fl#fotoesempio
Nikon D810 - Zeiss 21/2.8, Zeiss 25/2, Zeiss 28/2, Nikon 28mm f/2 AI, Zeiss 35/1.4, Zeiss 50/1.4, Zeiss M-P 50/2, Zeiss Milvus 50/1.4, Zeiss 85/1.4,  Zeiss M-P 100/2, Nikon 105/2.5 AI, Nikon AF-D 105/2 DC, Zeiss 135/2, Nikon AF-D 135/2 DC, Nikon AF 200/4 Micro Nikkor.

OCD

  • Obsessive Corgi Disorder
  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 97
You seem to have mostly answered your own question already?

The 70-200mm would not be a suitable portrait lens for my use. I would consider keeping your favourite portrait lens/lenses, sell the rest, and look to purchase the less expensive 70-200 f4G zoom. What is the problem with your 180mm AF-D for landscape pictures. I am very happy with my copy for landscape use.

Cheers

+ 1 

Jedi

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 152
  • Let the light be with you!
You seem to have mostly answered your own question already?

What is the problem with your 180mm AF-D for landscape pictures. I am very happy with my copy for landscape use.

Cheers

It's very sharp only for portrait and middle distances. At infinity is very poor; with AF Tuning at +10 is a bit better, but it isn't great, no...., my 180mm.
Nikon D810 - Zeiss 21/2.8, Zeiss 25/2, Zeiss 28/2, Nikon 28mm f/2 AI, Zeiss 35/1.4, Zeiss 50/1.4, Zeiss M-P 50/2, Zeiss Milvus 50/1.4, Zeiss 85/1.4,  Zeiss M-P 100/2, Nikon 105/2.5 AI, Nikon AF-D 105/2 DC, Zeiss 135/2, Nikon AF-D 135/2 DC, Nikon AF 200/4 Micro Nikkor.

armando_m

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 3528
  • Guadalajara México
    • http://armando-m.smugmug.com/
I was thinking what BEZ already recommended

Armando Morales
D800, Nikon 1 V1, Fuji X-T3

MILLIREHM

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 850
  • Vienna, Austria
The 70-200/2,8  FL lens is an extraordinary lens but I am not too sure whether it is a one-for-all-purposes solution. Maybe you should rent and test one how it fits your need. But I hardly believe it can replace all those other lenses.

Imho my impression is that the 85/1,4 D is a lens with aggressive sharpness, sometimes too much for portrais - but perfect If you want to go a different portrait approach while exactly using that kind of aggressiveness
Wolfgang Rehm

Jedi

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 152
  • Let the light be with you!
The 70-200/2,8  FL lens is an extraordinary lens but I am not too sure whether it is a one-for-all-purposes solution. Maybe you should rent and test one how it fits your need. But I hardly believe it can replace all those other lenses.

Imho my impression is that the 85/1,4 D is a lens with aggressive sharpness, sometimes too much for portrais
:o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o
Excuse me, have you ever used this lens, the Nikon AF-D 85mm f/1.4?????? Aggressive sharpness???



Nikon D810 - Zeiss 21/2.8, Zeiss 25/2, Zeiss 28/2, Nikon 28mm f/2 AI, Zeiss 35/1.4, Zeiss 50/1.4, Zeiss M-P 50/2, Zeiss Milvus 50/1.4, Zeiss 85/1.4,  Zeiss M-P 100/2, Nikon 105/2.5 AI, Nikon AF-D 105/2 DC, Zeiss 135/2, Nikon AF-D 135/2 DC, Nikon AF 200/4 Micro Nikkor.

MFloyd

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 1780
  • My quest for the "perfect" speed blur
    • Adobe Portfolio
It's very sharp only for portrait and middle distances. At infinity is very poor; with AF Tuning at +10 is a bit better, but it isn't great, no...., my 180mm.

Do you have one ? I own one since last June. I'm using it also for longer distances; and this lens is tack sharp that it would even challenge fixed focus lenses. And for me it's also the perfect portrait lens:

portrait:

Nikon D5
Nikkor 70.0-200.0 mm f/2.8E FL
ƒ/7.1  200.0 mm 1/200s  ISO 1000

longer distance:

Nikon D5
Nikkor 70.0-200.0 mm f/2.8E FL
ƒ/5.0  98.0 mm 1/160  ISO 100
Γνῶθι σεαυτόν

Jedi

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 152
  • Let the light be with you!
Do you have one ? I own one since last June. I'm using it also for longer distances; and this lens is tack sharp that it would even challenge fixed focus lenses. And for me it's also the perfect portrait lens:


Nikon D5
70.0-200.0 mm f/2.8
ƒ/7.1  200.0 mm 1/200s  ISO 1000
:o :o :o :o
Maybe I will check my 180mm......  :'( :'( :'( :'(
Nikon D810 - Zeiss 21/2.8, Zeiss 25/2, Zeiss 28/2, Nikon 28mm f/2 AI, Zeiss 35/1.4, Zeiss 50/1.4, Zeiss M-P 50/2, Zeiss Milvus 50/1.4, Zeiss 85/1.4,  Zeiss M-P 100/2, Nikon 105/2.5 AI, Nikon AF-D 105/2 DC, Zeiss 135/2, Nikon AF-D 135/2 DC, Nikon AF 200/4 Micro Nikkor.

MFloyd

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 1780
  • My quest for the "perfect" speed blur
    • Adobe Portfolio
This was a sharpness test taken with my old pre-AI Nikkor-P 180mm f/2.8 lens. I find it pretty sharp.


Nikon D610
Nikkor-P 180.0 mm f/2.8
ƒ/2.8  180.0 mm 1/800s  ISO 250
Γνῶθι σεαυτόν

Jedi

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 152
  • Let the light be with you!
This was a sharpness test taken with my old pre-AI Nikkor-P 180mm f/2.8 lens. I find it pretty sharp.


Nikon D610
Nikkor-P 180.0 mm f/2.8
ƒ/2.8  180.0 mm 1/800s  ISO 250
Yes. it is!
Nikon D810 - Zeiss 21/2.8, Zeiss 25/2, Zeiss 28/2, Nikon 28mm f/2 AI, Zeiss 35/1.4, Zeiss 50/1.4, Zeiss M-P 50/2, Zeiss Milvus 50/1.4, Zeiss 85/1.4,  Zeiss M-P 100/2, Nikon 105/2.5 AI, Nikon AF-D 105/2 DC, Zeiss 135/2, Nikon AF-D 135/2 DC, Nikon AF 200/4 Micro Nikkor.

Jedi

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 152
  • Let the light be with you!
Perhaps the 70-200mm is too aggressive for portraits? I am not convinced. I haven't got the 70-200mm, but can you look at these pictures, please? (they aren't my pictures).


https://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?l=it&t=2611259


https://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=2610042&l=it


They're wonderful for portraits, imho. Aren't you agree??
Nikon D810 - Zeiss 21/2.8, Zeiss 25/2, Zeiss 28/2, Nikon 28mm f/2 AI, Zeiss 35/1.4, Zeiss 50/1.4, Zeiss M-P 50/2, Zeiss Milvus 50/1.4, Zeiss 85/1.4,  Zeiss M-P 100/2, Nikon 105/2.5 AI, Nikon AF-D 105/2 DC, Zeiss 135/2, Nikon AF-D 135/2 DC, Nikon AF 200/4 Micro Nikkor.

MFloyd

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 1780
  • My quest for the "perfect" speed blur
    • Adobe Portfolio
Jedi. I'm not too sure what do you mean with "agressive" for portraits.
Γνῶθι σεαυτόν

David H. Hartman

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2778
  • I Doctor Photographs... :)
I would not sell those prime lenses. I could not bear to. I'd eat rice and beans until I could save enough money to buy the AF-S 70-200/2.8E FL, etc. Nikkor.

Dave Hartman who unfortunately doesn't own any of the discussed lenses.
Beatniks are out to make it rich
Oh no, must be the season of the witch!