Unlike many, I have not just downloaded and praised ... I have read a great deal of the material. (Can't say I've read every word, but a majority.)
That said, here are my comments ...
Praise first Thanks for the time and effort in putting this together: a treasure trove.
The lenses with which I am familiar, I agree with your findings (for the most part).
My experiences lead me to trust your eyes and your reviews on most anything in the future ...
That said, here are some elements which could use improvement/revision ...
Minor criticismsYour Table of Contents Page numbers (in many cases) don't match your actual page numbers of the topic.
Since the subject is close-up and macro, you don't even get into the reverse-macro options with lenses like the 28mm AI-S, which is a dandy for reverse macro.
Your evaluation of the Sigma 180mm macro was not objective, but only from 'your' static use parameters ... it is excellent for long-reach in the field (of live moving subjects, not flowers).
Cheers.
PS: I would have liked to see a section devoted to the Noct 58 vs. the Otus 55