D810 successor in the pipeline?

[CS]

Thank you & you are entiteled to love your D810!!!

I want XQD cards, two of them
I want the D5/500 AF
I want The D5/D500 WB
I want D5/D500 ISO performance
I want native ISO 25
I want a decent microphone decoupling
I want the F6/D500 ground glass to focus MF lenses like in the old times
I want a stunnig tonality in soft light, esp. for purple flowers and very soft gradients in blueish greens

In short: I want a 5th or 5th & a half generation FX camera

I think you want a D5X.

[David H. Hartman]

Please Nikon not more than 42MP!

The specs are surely already set. What they do is what they believe will sell considering the needs buyers and more. Some really need more MP(s) other want them and I fear them from a processing and storage perspective.

Dave Hartman

[MILLIREHM]

Got the D800E (amongst others) and am satisfied. Dont know whether a D820 can make me go for leap-frogging the D810. Having a faster camera with more modern AF would be fine. But i definitely won't need more than 36 MP. Given the higher pixel density of the D500 and the revived pixel-race of the opponents there will be definitely more pixels in a D810 successor

[MFloyd]

I want a D5x 😎

[PedroS]

I want a D5x 😎

+1

[PedroS]

I got the D3, the D600 & the D500. I am pretty well served for the moment.

Different approach here...

D4s, D810 & D500
 

[MILLIREHM]

Waiting for the D5S

[Frank Fremerey]

You forgot 42MP 

54 would also be OK, but MP are not the important part for me

[David H. Hartman]

54MP?

I can almost smell the magic smoke pouring from my hard drives.

Dave Hartman

[Bjørn Rørslett]

I want 96 MPix.

[Bent Hjarbo]

Just bought a used D800 on black friday to complement my D500 and D700, so I will not wait for a new D810, got pixels enough

[pluton]

I think you want a D5X.

Yes, many of us want a D5x.  IF they don't price it US$2000 over the D5, as they did with the D3>D3x relationship.

[Michael Erlewine]

If I learn anything here on NikonGear, it is how we each value cameras and lenses differently. Why I LOVE the D810 is because of two main reasons:

(1) A true ISO 64. The enhanced blacks were, IMO, a great move forward for my work and probably what inspired me to want to segue into MF range.

(2) A useable LiveVIew. It is not all that I really need, but unlike the D800 and D800E, which were not really usable, the LiveView on the D810 has been useable enough that I have yet to even use the OVF, except to verify that it works.

So yes, I look forward to the specs on the D910 (or whatever name it will bear), but it would have to have at least what I outlined above, plus more megapixels. If I could afford it, I would have 100 Mpx, for sure, not because I want to make billboards, but because of all the advantages of large sensors, which I won’t repeat here.

It will be interesting to compare what the FF sensor can do compared to the new small MF cameras like the Hasselblad X1D and the Fuji GFX.

[richardHaw]

would be nice to have a higher MP camera.

D8xx - high resolution studio camera

D7xx - general purpose camera

D??? - high speed/performance low MP sensor (FX missing)

i will admit that the D500 scratched a big itch (D300s), so I hope that they make one for the D700

[Pistnbroke]

Just get rid of those stupid pro controls or at least  have a lock on the settings menu ...54 MP +  and for gods sake a quartz controlled clock in the thing .