Author Topic: IR-whirl  (Read 1729 times)

Fons Baerken

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 11152
    • https://www.flickr.com/photos/fonsbaerken/
IR-whirl
« on: June 26, 2015, 11:38:29 »

Bjørn Rørslett

  • Fierce Bear of the North
  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 8252
  • Oslo, Norway
Re: IR-whirl
« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2015, 12:09:59 »
I find the image slightly vexing. Too much of detail makes the image hard to read. If the whirl is the main subject, mightn't it be better to bring it forward by reducing clutter elsewhere? I'd like to hear thoughts on this.

Fons Baerken

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 11152
    • https://www.flickr.com/photos/fonsbaerken/
Re: IR-whirl
« Reply #2 on: June 26, 2015, 12:54:10 »
i see your point, well i am trying to find my way in false colour ir editing, to get the colours i want seems the hardest,
the distortion of the whirl is a photoshop preset.

Bjørn Rørslett

  • Fierce Bear of the North
  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 8252
  • Oslo, Norway
Re: IR-whirl
« Reply #3 on: June 26, 2015, 12:58:01 »
"the distortion of the whirl is a photoshop preset."

Thought as much. Use such effects sparingly appears to be the best way.

Bruno Schroder

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 1664
  • Future is the only way forward
Re: IR-whirl
« Reply #4 on: June 26, 2015, 13:45:13 »
I'm with Bjorn on this; the coloured upper space is competing with the monocolor whirl which appears secondary and more distracting than the main subject.

I like the coloured structure which reminds me of the inside of fractal figures.
Bruno Schröder

Reality is frequently inaccurate. (Douglas Adams)