Author Topic: Canon vs. Nikon Durability  (Read 2971 times)

Chip Chipowski

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 372
  • You ARE NikonGear

Hugh_3170

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 2138
  • Back in Melbourne!
Re: Canon vs. Nikon Durability
« Reply #1 on: July 07, 2016, 04:23:20 »
There are some really very strange people out there!

Sadly, the items that they tested would have been nice in someones collections or in the hands of a photography student shooting film assignments.
Hugh Gunn

Akira

  • Homo jezoensis
  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 12866
  • Tokyo, Japan
Re: Canon vs. Nikon Durability
« Reply #2 on: July 07, 2016, 05:22:59 »
Chip, thanks for shating.  This is the easiest and the quickest way I have ever known to this day to remove the strap from a camera, regardless of the brand.
"The eye is blind if the mind is absent." - Confucius

"Limitation is inspiration." - Akira

bjornthun

  • Guest
Re: Canon vs. Nikon Durability
« Reply #3 on: July 07, 2016, 18:49:51 »
So much carnage and mayhem.  ;D  ;D  ;D

RBSinTo

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 474
Re: Canon vs. Nikon Durability
« Reply #4 on: July 23, 2016, 17:32:24 »
As soon as I watched this, I checked out my SLR camera bag to make sure these idiots hadn't stolen my FA body to make their stupid video.
It would have been far more useful if he had placed his testicles on the base plate instead of perfectly good film gear.
Robert
I shoot with film. That's film. F...i...l...m. You remember film. It was in all the papers.

Hugh_3170

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 2138
  • Back in Melbourne!
Re: Canon vs. Nikon Durability
« Reply #5 on: July 24, 2016, 03:11:39 »
Very well said Robert.

I grew up in a relatively poor farming community, and much old farm equipment was modified and repurposed over the years - some still in action after 70 years or more since new.  In some cases the addition of hydraulic rams to replace mechanical lifts etc was all that was done;  in some cases even electronic devices for seeding and counting get added in.  Just because something is old or imagined to be out of date, there is no reason to trash it - especially if a few modifications can lift its efficiency or effectiveness.  Besides photography students (well here in Melbourne at least) still do some film work as part of their courses and they are always on the lookout for usable film cameras.

As soon as I watched this, I checked out my SLR camera bag to make sure these idiots hadn't stolen my FA body to make their stupid video.
It would have been far more useful if he had placed his testicles on the base plate instead of perfectly good film gear.
Robert
Hugh Gunn

elsa hoffmann

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3822
  • Cape Town, South Africa
    • Elsa Hoffmann
Re: Canon vs. Nikon Durability
« Reply #6 on: July 24, 2016, 10:52:23 »
IN South Africa too the photography students still mostly use film cameras. The schools are very slow in switching over - probably due to cost and then factor if you are buying Photoshop - it is a costly affair - hence the situation I think
"You don’t take a photograph – you make it” – Ansel Adams. Thats why I use photoshop.
www.phototourscapetown.com
www.elsa.co.za. www.intimateimages.co.za

bjornthun

  • Guest
Re: Canon vs. Nikon Durability
« Reply #7 on: July 24, 2016, 16:11:19 »
Film and development is costly too, and could easily eclipse a PS subscription in cost. Old digital cameras like the Nikon D700, Canon 5D or the not so old Sony A7 can be found cheaply these days, so film is likely the most costly alternative for students now. Lots of old lenses can be used on these cameras, and the stock Sony A7 will take anything but rangefinder wide angles, even lenses from before World War II.

Developing film has a negative environmental footprint, so I think of film cameras mostly as collectors items. If not they can be recycled and digital cameras can be re-used. APS-C/DX digital system cameras aren't that expensive in the used market.

the solitaire

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 624
Re: Canon vs. Nikon Durability
« Reply #8 on: August 20, 2016, 01:32:03 »
Developing B&W film at least can be done using coffee reducing the environmental footprint ;)
Buddy

dslater

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 99
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: Canon vs. Nikon Durability
« Reply #9 on: August 21, 2016, 16:02:38 »
There are some really very strange people out there!

Sadly, the items that they tested would have been nice in someones collections or in the hands of a photography student shooting film assignments.

I think what you mean is there are some really big a#%$#%&s out there. Maybe they should test the durability of their skulls next.

Hugh_3170

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 2138
  • Back in Melbourne!
Re: Canon vs. Nikon Durability
« Reply #10 on: August 21, 2016, 16:49:10 »
I most certainly would not disagree with you on this matter!  ;)

I think what you mean is there are some really big a#%$#%&s out there. Maybe they should test the durability of their skulls next.
Hugh Gunn