Author Topic: !DAILY UPDATES! June. 366 days: your 2016 in photographs (Read 80293 times)

Fons Baerken · « **Reply #120 on:** June 10, 2016, 13:40:23 »

Quote from: Frank Fremerey on June 10, 2016, 10:01:51

Fons. I love #114.3 it is really touching

Quote from: John Geerts on June 10, 2016, 08:53:12

Great close-ups, Bruno and Fons.

definitely wanted wide open apertures, thanks

Fons Baerken · « **Reply #121 on:** June 10, 2016, 13:46:53 »

also downsizing for jpg in one step used to downsize by halfsize increments

BTW this at @5.6

John Geerts · « **Reply #122 on:** June 10, 2016, 14:52:36 »

June 10th partly clouded. Not so nice as yesterday

Mother and Daughter are volunteering in the Cityfarm.

John Geerts · « **Reply #123 on:** June 10, 2016, 15:02:11 »

And fresh Strawberries

This time with Df 200/2

Fons Baerken · « **Reply #124 on:** June 10, 2016, 15:42:29 »

thats a hefty beast that 200/2 ais

Frank Fremerey · « **Reply #125 on:** June 10, 2016, 15:45:16 »

That is a coool photo with the 2/200!!!

John Geerts · « **Reply #126 on:** June 10, 2016, 16:05:27 »

Thanks Frank and Fons. It's the 200/2 AI version with built-in Hood. But still 2.400 grams, it takes some training to master. Also to find a fitting bag (including camera) and strap, which I found at a dumpstore.

But the 200/2 is one of a kind.

the solitaire · « **Reply #127 on:** June 10, 2016, 16:38:23 »

The 200 f2 is a lens I would buy without a seconds hesitation if I had the small change to do so. Excellent example of how to use it John

Frank Fremerey · « **Reply #128 on:** June 10, 2016, 17:22:12 »

Ok. 5500 new. 4000 used for the VR2. 2000 used for the MF ED.

That is serious money. Although the weight is more of my concern.

John Geerts · « **Reply #129 on:** June 10, 2016, 19:00:47 »

Quote from: the solitaire on June 10, 2016, 16:38:23

The 200 f2 is a lens I would buy without a seconds hesitation if I had the small change to do so. Excellent example of how to use it John

Thanks. Well actually I did hesitate when I saw the lens a year ago, because it was too expensive to my feeling. Great was my surprise to discover a month ago, it was still unsold, and at a 50% discount, and I didn't hesitate one milli-sec.

If weight is a concern Frank you should look for the Ai or Ais, it's 500 gram less

Harald · « **Reply #130 on:** June 10, 2016, 20:15:43 »

Hi,

yes, the 200 / 2 is perhaps a nearly perfect lens. But i would not buy it because it is too heavy for my. And too expensive.

Perhaps i can try it on one of the next fotowalks?

But here are some of my photos, all shot with the DF and the 30€-lens 75-150mm f3.5. I am every time impressed....