There is no need to buy factory new lenses as the second-hand market is immense and many alternatives are easy to get hold of. If one has the patience, the more scarce gems of the manual-lens era also can be sourced.
Well, there
is a need. I work a lot of hours and don't have the time to troll eBay for obscure lenses. (In fact, I created this thread to "mine for ideas," so I appreciate the responses.)
One thing I did find, for example, is a slightly opposing view.
For example, the revered Noct Nikkor 58 (priced at $3,000 used) was actually considered less desirable overall in
this review as the ordinary Nikon NIKKOR 50mm f/1.2 in
this review (same reviewer).
Maybe the Noct has a couple of peculiar qualities that distinguish it ... but is it really worth a $2,400 price difference? (Doesn't seem so, based on these review.)
I would rather pay $700 for a brand-new, untouched,
literally mint 50mm f/1.2 lens ... that is better than any other elder lens except (maybe) the Noct ... than spend hours online (time = money) saving a couple-hundred for a used iteration.
I am thinking that, soon, these old (now, brand-new) lenses may someday be collector's items
![Huh ???](https://nikongear.net/revival/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
The synergetic MF Nikkor is the legendary 105 mm f/2.5. Select the version that best suits its intended use. personally I favour the AI, but the early "Sonnar" has many followers as well.
Thanks for the tip!
Virtually all of these Nikkors can be CPU-modified to further enhance their versatility with newer cameras.
I have thought about doing this with a Voigtländer I have ... but I am starting to like the idea of "off the grid" lenses
![Grin ;D](https://nikongear.net/revival/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
Jack