Author Topic: 16-35 vs. 18-35  (Read 30731 times)

longzoom

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 770
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: 16-35 vs. 18-35
« Reply #60 on: June 12, 2016, 01:32:38 »
20100625-Copy of 0610 115-2 - Copy by 20100625-Copy of 0610 115-2 by longzoom, on Flickrom/photos/longzo20100625-Copy of 0610 115-2-3 by longzoom, on Flickrom/]longzoom[/url], on Flickr.      My copy of 16-35 was very good on D3.  So the image and 2 crops.  LZ

longzoom

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 770
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: 16-35 vs. 18-35
« Reply #61 on: June 12, 2016, 01:36:54 »
20130527-003 by 20130527-003-2 by longzoom, on Flickrotos/longzoom/]longzoom[/url], on Flickr.      But on D800 the lens looks stunning, with its sheer resolving power.  Image, crop.  LZ

Spirit Vision Photography

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: 16-35 vs. 18-35
« Reply #62 on: May 15, 2026, 05:03:58 »
I take possession of my 18-35 G glass very soon.  The 16-35 was just too big and bulky for my liking.  Up to now I’ve been using a 17 and 20 primes. It will be interesting to compare the results.