Back to the main subject. This is an uninteresting picture, but for test purposes. 28/2 wide open on D800. The photo shows that
- resistance to backlight is very good (many lenses would fail that test) in the sense that the highlights would not contaminate the shadows in a significant way. This only applies to the bigger surfaces;
- Distortion is conspicuous but regular barrel, and easily corrected "by hand" (typically +6-+8 in Lightroom)
- Vignetting is moderate (compared e.g. with Zeiss lenses)
- central sharpness is very good, and the "center" is not that small !
- however, the "bleeding" caused by highlights is massive at the borders of dark parts ; the "cross" at the top of the organ case is completely blurred, although the same wood carvings below are OK
- in the upper left corner, you will see that there is some preserved detail smeared by tons of mush
- CA is visible above the top part of the organ case (orange fringes at the edges of the window frames), but moderate - remember it's a 36 Mp sensor we got here
Bottom line : far from ridiculous ! but for working against the light, better stop down a bit. The issues are the coma & astigmatism, plus the "bleeding" issues. Concerning the latter, I do not precisely know the driving factors (reflections between surfaces of adjacent lenses? hence the efficiency of modern coatings?)