Image size test

[Bjørn J]

This is 1600 px wide, posted as an inline attachment. I want to see how it displays in my Firefox...

[Bjørn J]

Interesting. This downsamples properly, and adjusts itself if I resize Firefox.

[Bjørn J]

This is the same image when located on an external server.
Displayed here with the "add image" button:

[Bjørn J]

This did not work, image is not downsampled in Firefox, and way too large.

[Bjørn Rørslett]

The SMF css section is set to handle attachment and linked images in the same manner. Apparently, this works perfect with your sample images.

The resizing is pure css, no javascript or plugins are employed.

[Bjørn J]

The SMF css section is set to handle attachment and linked images in the same manner. Apparently, this works perfect with your sample images.

The resizing is pure css, no javascript or plugins are employed.

So in your Firefox, the linked image displays properly, same as the first inline attachment?

[Birna Rørslett]

Yes. No difference at all.

[Bjørn J]

And it doesn't work properly in Chrome or IE either....

[Bjørn Rørslett]

Image resizing works in Firefox on all platforms tested so far (Windows 7, 2003, Linux). IE is as usual a sad story, but your image does change size even there (to be precise, it gets upscaled, but won't shrink below its initial size in my IE 11).

[Frank Fremerey]

I am on Firefox/Android here and have to scroll both

[Anthony]

On Mac/FF both images work fine.  If I shrink the FF window they resize until they are really small and then are cropped - but that only happens when the window is too small to be useful.  The larger versions both resize properly whatever the window size.

Same on Mac/Safari.

[Bjørn Rørslett]

Admit I'm puzzled by the different responses across member's computers and browsers. As I already stated, the resizing relies solely on CSS and no javascripts are involved. All modern CSS3 compliant browsers should be able to handle this functionality by design.

Perhaps the various users have no-standardised browser setting active? Then tracking down and correcting the enigmatic behaviour of image resizing really can be time-consuming.

Andrea has had eye issues of late and might need an operation to correct a retina going astray. We'll keep her away for a while and try to find practical solution while she is on the mend.

[armando_m]

On Mac/FF both images work fine.  If I shrink the FF window they resize until they are really small and then are cropped - but that only happens when the window is too small to be useful.  The larger versions both resize properly whatever the window size.

Same on Mac/Safari.

Same behavior on Win 7 / FF - displays/resized  both images without the need to scroll

[Bjørn J]

Admit I'm puzzled by the different responses across member's computers and browsers. As I already stated, the resizing relies solely on CSS and no javascripts are involved. All modern CSS3 compliant browsers should be able to handle this functionality by design.

Perhaps the various users have no-standardised browser setting active? Then tracking down and correcting the enigmatic behaviour of image resizing really can be time-consuming.

Andrea has had eye issues of late and might need an operation to correct a retina going astray. We'll keep her away for a while and try to find practical solution while she is on the mend.

As far as I know my Firefox has pretty standard settings, except that I have restrictions on cookies and privacy. I run AdBlock and a few other add-ons, but I have disabled many of them during this testing.
I will probably do a complete uninstall/reinstall of FF, but it puzzles me that Chrome and IE also have the same display issues.

[afx]

My FF on Linux displays the image just fine without scrolling. Chrome also is just fine.

cheers
afx