Author Topic: Form Factor  (Read 5352 times)

Frank Fremerey

  • engineering art
  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 13252
  • Bonn, Germany
Form Factor
« on: September 07, 2015, 21:04:31 »
This jumped at me today...

FG vs. X100T
Ego autem dico vobis: diligite inimicos vestros

Asle F

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 329
  • Hovet, Norway
    • Fjell og foto, my mountain and photo blog in Norwegian
Re: Form Factor
« Reply #1 on: September 07, 2015, 21:21:55 »
Looks like an EM to me.
There is no illusion, it just looks that way.

Frank Fremerey

  • engineering art
  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 13252
  • Bonn, Germany
Re: Form Factor
« Reply #2 on: September 07, 2015, 21:50:04 »
I never had the camera. It was by catch of a lens puchase.

what really floored me that the EM and the X100T are just the same
In size and weight
Ego autem dico vobis: diligite inimicos vestros

Bjørn Rørslett

  • Fierce Bear of the North
  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 8253
  • Oslo, Norway
Re: Form Factor
« Reply #3 on: September 07, 2015, 21:52:28 »
... the "only" difference being the smaller format of the Fuji's sensor. The Nikon EM was 24x36mm (FX in current Nikon-speak).

stenrasmussen

  • Guest
Re: Form Factor
« Reply #4 on: September 07, 2015, 22:48:14 »
And to compare the EM with the Sony a7rII:
EM dimensions 135 × 54 × 86 mm
a7rII dimensions 127 x 60 x 96 mm

And for good measure, the
D5500 dimensions 124 x 70 x 97 mm


Frank Fremerey

  • engineering art
  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 13252
  • Bonn, Germany
Re: Form Factor
« Reply #5 on: September 07, 2015, 23:19:17 »
... the "only" difference being the smaller format of the Fuji's sensor. The Nikon EM was 24x36mm (FX in current Nikon-speak).

Thank Engineer's that the sensor of the X100T is better than anything we will ever see in 24x36 qmm
Ego autem dico vobis: diligite inimicos vestros

Jørgen Ramskov

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1103
  • Aarhus, Denmark
Re: Form Factor
« Reply #6 on: September 08, 2015, 10:26:38 »
I like your PP.
Jørgen Ramskov

Chip Chipowski

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 402
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: Form Factor
« Reply #7 on: September 08, 2015, 17:36:52 »
Frank, what hood is that? (on the Nikon)  Looks nice. 

Ian R

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 92
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: Form Factor
« Reply #8 on: September 08, 2015, 17:54:36 »
Frank, what hood is that? (on the Nikon)  Looks nice.

Looks like an HR-4 to me (also fits the 35mm E)

Frank Fremerey

  • engineering art
  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 13252
  • Bonn, Germany
Re: Form Factor
« Reply #9 on: September 08, 2015, 18:11:20 »
Yes, Nikon rubber Hood HR-4. That is correct.
Ego autem dico vobis: diligite inimicos vestros

Chip Chipowski

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 402
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: Form Factor
« Reply #10 on: September 08, 2015, 20:16:24 »
Thanks guys, it looks like a perfect match for the 50mm pancake :)

pluton

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 2865
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: Form Factor
« Reply #11 on: September 09, 2015, 05:15:54 »
Thank Engineer's that the sensor of the X100T is better than anything we will ever see in 24x36 qmm
With this I agree...my Fujifilm 16MP sensor blows away my former beloved Kodachrome 25.
Keith B., Santa Monica, CA, USA

Gary

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1867
  • Southern California
    • Snaps
Re: Form Factor
« Reply #12 on: September 09, 2015, 05:27:27 »
My X-T1's reminds me of the feel of my ol' FM. I also appreciate the PP and borders.

"Everywhere you look there are photographs, it is the call of photographers to see and capture them."- Gary Ayala
My snaps are here: www.garyayala.com
Critiquing my snaps are always welcomed and appreciated.