Author Topic: Australia's South West Coast  (Read 191 times)

Les Olson

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 546
  • You ARE NikonGear
Australia's South West Coast
« on: May 24, 2026, 04:36:58 »
The South West is a place apart, shaped by sandy soil, low summer rainfall, and a coast that is a sailor's nightmare - the long deep swells and frequent storms of the Southern Ocean, numerous reefs, no natural harbours, and plenty of seals to keep the Great White population healthy. Except for the sharks, a surfer's dream, especially in summer when a prevailing easterly wind smooths the face of the swell. These are on the Margaret River beach, with the famous point break on the right in the first one (Z50II with 16-50/2.8 at 16mm).

North of Perth there is less rain and the dominant trees are grass trees (Xanthorrhoea sp), which can be 6 m tall including the flower spike and form vast "forests". Also in this area there is a remarkable landscape called The Pinnacles - fields of limestone columns up to 4 m tall standing in bare sandy soil. They look like a petrified forest, but the mechanism of formation of the columns is controversial.

Sharpness is a bourgeois concept (Henri Cartier-Bresson)

Fons Baerken

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 12371
    • https://www.flickr.com/photos/fonsbaerken/
Re: Australia's South West Coast
« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2026, 09:32:07 »
Without natural phenomena, like these, there'd be no photography.

Les Olson

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 546
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: Australia's South West Coast
« Reply #2 on: May 24, 2026, 10:31:34 »
There is a difference between an interesting photograph and a photograph of something interesting, but I agree that one of the reasons photography is interesting is the inexhaustible specialness of the world.
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept (Henri Cartier-Bresson)

Akira

  • Homo jezoensis
  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 13346
  • Tokyo, Japan
Re: Australia's South West Coast
« Reply #3 on: May 24, 2026, 12:20:47 »
The landscape captured in the last one looks very peculiar.  Thank you for sharing!

How do you like the Z 16-50/2.8 zoom?
"The eye is blind if the mind is absent." - Confucius

"Limitation is inspiration." - Akira

Birna Rørslett

  • Global Moderator
  • **
  • Posts: 6686
  • A lesser fierce bear of the North
Re: Australia's South West Coast
« Reply #4 on: May 24, 2026, 15:14:51 »
Very interesting landscape features, for sure.

Isn't the 16-50/2.8 on the big and heavy side for a Z50-type camera?

Akira

  • Homo jezoensis
  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 13346
  • Tokyo, Japan
Re: Australia's South West Coast
« Reply #5 on: Today at 00:21:01 »
Very interesting landscape features, for sure.

Isn't the 16-50/2.8 on the big and heavy side for a Z50-type camera?

It is much larger than the 16-50/3.5-6.3 kit zoom, but 330g of 16-50/2.8 is not all that heavy methinks.  I'm also using Z30 + 35/1.8S combo (which makes almost the same weight and size) and it's light and compact enough.  I'm looking at the f2.8 zoom as more versatile all-rounder than f3.5-6.3 one.
"The eye is blind if the mind is absent." - Confucius

"Limitation is inspiration." - Akira

Les Olson

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 546
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: Australia's South West Coast
« Reply #6 on: Today at 04:12:15 »
Isn't the 16-50/2.8 on the big and heavy side for a Z50-type camera?

Yes ... but. On the Z50II it is manageable, but using it all day I found the balance sub-optimal and I can see that might be problematic on a Zfc. However, the handling would not deter me from using the lens.

The 16-50/2.8 is a very nice lens optically - clearly better than the F mount 16-80. If an optically superior, large aperture mid-range zoom for DX is what is wanted, the 16-50/2.8 is it. For me, 16mm is not wide enough and I don't use the 35-50mm range a lot, so for travel and walk-around the 12-28 is a better fit, despite the smaller apertures.








Sharpness is a bourgeois concept (Henri Cartier-Bresson)