I like your fighting spirit .... however your opponent is big and mighty
If any consolation, the exact same issues arise if TC14Z replaces the TC20Z. For better or worse, Nikon strictly adhere to their own play book.
Forcing the TC into an FTZ is possible if you Dremel away parts of the stray light guard. However, it won't help in the end if the software lock engages.
Putting an extension ring with pass-through contacts on the TC, then a *supported* lens on the front will work, however, won't add much practical value?
I think I will be purchasing the TC-1.4x Z as well for this reason:
https://www.photomacrography.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=48840&p=307879#p307879
The image quality is superb. I see no loss of sharpness with the TC-2.0x unless I zoom in 400%+ for tiny hints of CA to show up. Obviously, the TC was coupled with top-notch objectives as well.
An adaptor will need to trick the camera into thinking the lens is compatible. Since the FTZ handles AF on F-mount lenses, I would like to assume the lock is merely software. The camera sees the Z-mount TC and then an adaptor it does not recognise, or it does, they just do not want us to use it this way. Is there a way to trick the camera into thinking the FTZ and whatever's attached is say, a 500mm F4S, or a compatible lens?
The FTZ would recognise the lens being mounted to it. So these signals can then be converted to something the camera with the TC likes.
It is dobale for sure but there is no motivation I think. The audience of large primes would just say "buy a modern one", they can afford it. I am not saying they are wealthy, they can justify it and sell off one of their big F-mount primes that holds value anyway.
It was fun until I scratched the thing. I will be keeping it though so it does not matter in the end. Even if I change systems, I will simply replace both mounts with SM2 threads.
There is a lunar eclipse tonight. Time for this unconventional setup to capture more moon images.