Very nice use of tranquil IR cloud reflections contrasting the grim tube feeding who knows what...
The clip-in filter caught my attention: Do you see any more problems with flares or wide angle corners performance (due to the steep angle caused by the close proximity of the clip-in filter to the lens rear element) than with an on-sensor of front mounted filter? I am thinking if a full-spectrum body can be combined as an extra visible light body with clip-in UV-IR cut (perhaps with Kolari's Nikon OEM filter offering), clip-in IR pass, and clip-in quartz protective window as base for UV (no UV-pass clip-in offered for that as I can see). Also is register distance adjusted to avoid problems with infinity focus due to different combined filter thicknesses behind the lens? Apparently what you have seems to work very well, but asking anyway. Ideally the IR-cut on the sensor would be removed and not replace with on-sensor quartz filter glass, but always be used with one type of clip-in or the other to replace it.
Kolari touts their clip-in filter approach as the ultimate solution but reality is different. Depending on the actual lens in use, the filter in position might work well, or there are artifacts like colour displacement or vignetting towards the periphery of the image frame. Strangely there is apparently no direct relation between angle of view of the lens and filter issues. Thus, for example, the Laowa 9mm f/5.6or the Nikkor 400mm f/4.5Z does well, whilst the 40mm f/2 Nikkor SE or the Nikkor 70-180mm f/2.8 sometimes shows colour issues. Not in all circumstances and focused distance may factor in here as well. Thus one simply has to try in practice and pay attention to situations where issues become troublesome.
A final warning is you do have to be very careful when the filter is put into place, as the edges are hard and might nick the sensor if you are careless. Which of course my Z5 sensor bears witness to already (there is a magnetic frame holder for the filter which wasn't properly positioned first time).