Author Topic: Nikon 180-600mm First Look Review: A Wildlife Photographer's Field Report  (Read 5843 times)

Fons Baerken

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 11139
    • https://www.flickr.com/photos/fonsbaerken/
Nikon 180-600mm First Look Review: A Wildlife Photographer's Field Report,

Steve Perry!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEmBkZsF5VE

Birna Rørslett

  • Global Moderator
  • **
  • Posts: 5578
  • A lesser fierce bear of the North
An interesting concept. The old 180-600 was a true beast and heavy as a boat anchor. Plus it had f/8 max. aperture.

Seems Nikon -- again -- aimed for the bull's eye and hit it. The price is, relatively speaking, quite low and affordable as well.

Bent Hjarbo

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 2289
  • Hvidovre, Denmark
    • Hjarbos hjemmeside
It seem a lot more gear have to be sold in order to upgrade, Z8 etc. :o
(D800 already gone, next D500 and possibly the Df ???)

Jan Anne

  • Noob
  • Global Moderator
  • **
  • Posts: 2045
  • Holland
    • Me on Flickr
Good to see Nikon deviated from the 200-500VR dust trombone design and went with an internal zoom construction like my Sony 200-600mm.

The new Nikon lens looks very similar to the Sony lens in most aspects like size, weight, aperture and the €2000 price tag but there are some small differences as the Nikon goes to 180mm on the short end, removable tripod collar vs replaceable foot, uses potentially slower stepping motors versus the faster linear motors in the Sony, etc.

Anyways, kudos for Nikon for another checkmark on the list of must have lenses :) This lens hugely popular in the Sony community so it will highly likely become a best seller for Nikon as well.
Cheers,
Jan Anne

Roland Vink

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 1535
  • Nikon Nerd from New Zealand
    • Nikon Database
An interesting concept. The old 180-600 was a true beast and heavy as a boat anchor. Plus it had f/8 max. aperture.
When I saw the subject heading I first assumed someone had reviewed the old AI 180-600/8*ED. The new lens has the same filter size (95mm), is over 100mm shorter than the old lens+FTZ and about 1.5kg lighter.

The old lens focuses down to 2.5m for an impressive 1:3 magnification. The new lens gets to 2.4m at 600mm with a maximum magnification of 1:4, which suggests more focal length reduction at close range (perhaps to compensate for "focus breathing"). Sometimes newer isn't always better.

At the wide end the aperture is f/5.6, a full stop faster than the old lens, narrowing down 1/3 of a stop to f/6.3 at 600mm, still a useful 2/3 stop faster than the old lens. With only 1/3 difference between wide and telephoto ends, it is nearly a constant aperture zoom.

The new 70-180/2.8 is also interesting. It is impressive that they managed to fit a 180/2.8 zoom (64mm entrance pupil) inside a barrel with 67mm filter. The Nikon 180/2.8 primes had larger 72mm filters, and zooms usually need larger filter sizes than equivalent primes. I wonder if they cheated on the focal length or max aperture, or if the lens suffers from strong vignetting? It should be a popular lens, and might fill the space normally taken by a 70-200/4 lens, gaining some speed in exchange for a shorter zoom range. The lens also reminds me of the series-E 70-150/3.5, being an affordable and relatively compact telephoto zoom with somewhat restricted zoom range but with faster than usual aperture.

Nasos Kosmas

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 990
  • Athens, Greece
It seem a lot more gear have to be sold in order to upgrade, Z8 etc. :o

That’s also my thought :o
Seems a very good lens and here is another very good initial review

https://youtu.be/k0w7BFner10

ColinM

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 1980
  • Herefordshire, UK
    • My Pictures
Thanks Nasos
Interesting that Steve Perry wasn't allowed to compare but a day later on posting, Ricci wasn't affected by that restriction.

Some interesting images in the section from 11.50 onwards

Erik Lund

  • Global Moderator
  • **
  • Posts: 6529
  • Copenhagen
    • ErikLund.com
Looks like another winner from Nikon! If you can live with the aperture then it's a universal lens. Looks sharp wide open according to early findings! Quite impressive ;)
Erik Lund

Nasos Kosmas

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 990
  • Athens, Greece
Thanks Nasos
Interesting that Steve Perry wasn't allowed to compare but a day later on posting, Ricci wasn't affected by that restriction.

Some interesting images in the section from 11.50 onwards

Yes Colin I already show the comparison with 200-500 and 500 pf  :) among others
If you are on Z that’s the lens for birding
If you go  for 200-500 that’s the right time

MEPER

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 1179
  • You ARE NikonGear
I wonder which would be the best performer at 560 mm?

400/4.5 + 1.4x converter or the 180-600 at 560 mm ?

The 400/4.5 + 1.4x converter would be the most compact of the two but more expensive.

Nasos Kosmas

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 990
  • Athens, Greece
I wonder which would be the best performer at 560 mm?

400/4.5 + 1.4x converter or the 180-600 at 560 mm ?

The 400/4.5 + 1.4x converter would be the most compact of the two but more expensive.
Take a look on Ricci’s video, looks about equal

MEPER

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 1179
  • You ARE NikonGear
Ok, maybe the 180 - 600 is a "no brainer" at that price point.

Jan Anne

  • Noob
  • Global Moderator
  • **
  • Posts: 2045
  • Holland
    • Me on Flickr
Thanks Nasos
Interesting that Steve Perry wasn't allowed to compare but a day later on posting, Ricci wasn't affected by that restriction.

Some interesting images in the section from 11.50 onwards
Steve is an independent photographer / reviewer whereas Ricci works for Nikon UK.
Cheers,
Jan Anne

richardHaw

  • Cute Panda from the East...
  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3182
  • Your lens loverboy
    • Classic Nikkor Maintenance and DIY
the true test for this lens is how well it will work together with TC :o :o :o

MEPER

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 1179
  • You ARE NikonGear
I wonder why the 400/4.5 is much more expensive than the 180-600 ?
Is it the 2 x Super-ED + 1 x SR lens elements that makes the price difference?
400/4.5 is a S-lens while 180-600 is not?