Voigtlander 125mm APO-Lanthar VS. & El Nikor APO 105mm

[Michael Erlewine]

Shots taken with two lens, same light, Nikon D810, Zerene Stacker, within minutes of one another. A little post development, as usual, but look at how different they look, in terms of color, etc.

The first is El Nikor APO 105mm f/5.6 and the second is Voigtlander 125mm APO-Lanthar f/2.5

Interesting.

[Bjørn Rørslett]

There is an appreciable shift in hue indeed. I would normally not consider the APO-Lanthar to be a "cold" lens so that might imply the EL-Nikkor is "warm" ?? Assuming of course the light regime was unaltered between the captures.

[Michael Erlewine]

It was all the same, so the El Nikkor is warmer. I will do some more comparisons of the two. Both are great, but at least in these two shots taken minutes apart, they are very different.

[Dr Klaus Schmitt]

hmm, how was the white balance done? With lenses having obviously different transmissions, especially in the blue wavelength, I would have done an individual white balance upfront.

[Michael Erlewine]

I do some more tomorrow with careful white balance.

[Almass]

I do some more tomorrow with careful white balance.

....and if you can compensate for the difference of 20mm so both pics have same comp 

[Dr Klaus Schmitt]

....and if you can compensate for the difference of 20mm so both pics have same comp 

you surely meant magnification ;-)

[Bjørn Rørslett]

My interpretation was the images should cover the same field. This of course will imply different perspectives as the focal lengths are not identical. Magnifications ought to be pretty similar, though.