NikonGear'23
Gear Talk => Processing & Publication => Topic started by: Fons Baerken on December 11, 2015, 01:21:04
-
Hello
Here is the file for challenge #11
https://www.dropbox.com/s/mxnn2braupdbav3/_DSC9652.NEF?dl=0 (https://www.dropbox.com/s/mxnn2braupdbav3/_DSC9652.NEF?dl=0)
I hope you like it
and I'm looking forward to your edits
Cheers
Fons
-
#1
-
#2 & #3
-
(https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/619/23586681701_681d0e4fbd_b.jpg)
-
(http://otoien.zenfolio.com/img/s5/v118/p1708641779.jpg)
-
Nice Tower, Fons ;)
-
A "powercrop"
and a standard
-
A more normal version; it was fun to get to play with a DF file.
(http://otoien.zenfolio.com/img/s5/v124/p1794439626.jpg)
-
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v233/Duke_1/_DSC9652_zps9gx3b6ps.jpg)
-
dark matter version
-
windy
-
Armando, now we are talking.
-
Armando. I love the stretch limo!
Thread-Participants: I love the way the contributions shake up the phantasy of the next contributers...
-
I was able to make the invisible visible. ;-)
(http://www.visualcue.photography/img/s9/v90/p1767329214-6.jpg)
-
Peter: When I created The "REC = RAW Editing Contest" ca. 45 editions ago, I was just thinking of this "creativity explosion" and "inspiring inspiration".
Frankly. The Participants are more or less the same regulars we had at the old place.
I am really happy.
-
Peter: When I created The "REC = RAW Editing Contest" ca. 45 editions ago, I was just thinking of this "creativity explosion" and "inspiring inspiration".
Frankly. The Participants are more or less the same regulars we had at the old place.
I am really happy.
I start thinking about software with tons of image manipulation capabilities ::)
-
Peter: When I created The "REC = RAW Editing Contest" ca. 45 editions ago, I was just thinking of this "creativity explosion" and "inspiring inspiration".
Frankly. The Participants are more or less the same regulars we had at the old place.
I am really happy.
Well, I am new. ;-)
-
Well, I am new. ;-)
Yes, great. I am even happier!
-
I was able to make the invisible visible. ;-)
Electric ! love it !
-
Electric ! love it !
Thank you. It is amazing what can be done with the tools that are at our disposal.
-
Electric ! love it !
Yes, this is something else, but I reckon it will be to clean for Good Old Fons
-
An appeal for my judgement ::) ;D
-
PeterN's image is really something different!
WOW!
-
A relatively calmer edit of the monolith
-
Inspiring footage to start with...
-
* post deleted * (see followup posts)
-
A beautiful interpretation, Charlie!!
-
I'm no master of such edits, so here's my boring version.
(https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5625/23142544073_0196e447b7_b.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/Bg2A5z)
2015-12-15 NikonGear Edit Challenge #11 (https://flic.kr/p/Bg2A5z) by Joergen Ramskov (https://www.flickr.com/photos/jramskov/), on Flickr
-
I don't think it's boring at all, Jørgen.
Beautiful work
-
PeterN: I do not recognize the NEF in your edit.
-
PeterN: I do not recognize the NEF in your edit.
That's what happens when I do an edit of an edit of an edit. ;-)
A remark was made that my earlier interpretation looked too "clean" for Fons (said with a smile) so I thought to make it more extravagant as an experiment. But I guess you're right. The top of the tower is the only thing that I recognize. If you think it's a bit too much, I agree. But I sometimes get fascinated by the possibilities of today's tools.
BTW: I did not know that it is mandatory to recognize the original photo. I will remove it
-
(https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/686/23696906821_0e9408531b_b.jpg)
-
That's what happens when I do an edit of an edit of an edit. ;-)
A remark was made that my earlier interpretation looked too "clean" for Fons (said with a smile) so I thought to make it more extravagant as an experiment. But I guess you're right. The top of the tower is the only thing that I recognize. If you think it's a bit too much, I agree. But I sometimes get fascinated by the possibilities of today's tools.
BTW: I did not know that it is mandatory to recognize the original photo. I will remove it
I don't think there are any firm rules in regards to the edits presented :)
-
Correction: the original RAW file is a starting point for any subsequent interpretation ....
-
Correction: the original RAW file is a starting point for any subsequent interpretation ....
So what does "starting point" mean: could the scene'object/subject look totally different or should it be recognizable? Is an edit of an edit allowed or not allowed (eg in my example, I changed the perspective, dramazitzed it and neonized it via a LR plugin; in the second one I took that result and modified that one further via LR plugins).
BTW: I am just trying to learn from this to prevent mistakes on my side! I am glad that Frank triggered me.
-
The RAW file delivers material for your own imagination and future processing. It's futile to make any constraints as these invariably will be exceeded one way or other, by one or several of the users involved.
It is worth keeping in mind that utilising and exploring the potential of a RAW file needn't be confined to these Edit Challenges - you can do likewise with captures of your own making :D
-
I was able to make the invisible visible. ;-)
(http://www.visualcue.photography/img/s9/v90/p1767329214-6.jpg)
Peter Nievaart has won this challenge with his interpration of the radiotower, congrats Peter
-
Thank you, Fons. Also for organizing the challenge.
I really liked your photo and the potential it offers for creative edits. I will look in the archives to find a new one.
-
great choice of inspiring work. Thank you Fons for the great file to work with!