New Nikkor Z 14-24mm f/2.8 s

[Erik Lund]

Looks really technical and again, lots of glass 

https://www.nikonusa.com/en/nikon-products/product/mirrorless-lenses/nikkor-z-14-24mm-f%252f2.8-s.html

Sample images:

https://www.nikon-image.com/products/nikkor/zmount/nikkor_z_14-24mm_f28_s/index.html

[Øivind Tøien]

650g only!

[Nikfuson]

The disadvantage with these new expensive lenses is...too much money involved.
The advantages there are many of.

[Erik Lund]

Yes, the suggested retail price is quite high and spoils the fun  When the 14-24mm f/2.8 came for F-Mount it was affordable as I recall,,,
I'll be keeping the F-Mount version and even use it on Z7 with the added bonus of having rainbows included in most sunny images   

[Erik Lund]

650g only!

Yes that's 300 grams lighter than the F-Mount, substantial

[Erik Lund]

Pice incl. vat in Denmark is 2.800,- €

[chambeshi]

MTFs etc

https://www.nikon-image.com/products/nikkor/zmount/nikkor_z_14-24mm_f28_s/spec.html

It is indeed impressive Nikon's engineers have kept the weight to 650g. It will be packaged with 2 lens hoods listed; HB97 takes 112 mm filters, and this zoom can also use rear gel filters.

[Roland Vink]

MTF at 14mm is amazingly good, basically a flat line across the top. MTF at 24mm shows some drop-off towards the outer part of the image, but otherwise equally impressive. Looks like an excellent addition to the Z lineup. Not sure who will use 112mm filters with this lens, unless it is protection from salt spray etc.

[Tristin]

If the distortion aspect isn't bad, this lens is going to be absolute gold.  Z mount really flexing it's potential with this one!  Color me impressed so far.

[Akira]

Along with the more humble 14-30/4.0, Nikon's new super-wideangle zooms are literally epoch-making: both allow to use front filters without bizarre adapters.

[Erik Lund]

New review and comparison - Comprehensive!

https://www.cameralabs.com/nikon-z-14-24mm-f2-8-s-review/ 

Looks like it performs very good - Only nitpicks compared to the F-mount version is the back ground Bokeh is not as smooth and the high $£€

[richardHaw]

thanks! probably too long for what i need

i just want a cheap 45/2.8E