Gear Talk > Processing & Publication
Fuji RAW and Lightroom
Luc:
The GFX50s had a Bayer sensor, not a X-Trans. The "problem" if any is processing X-Trans images with Adobe.
MFloyd:
--- Quote from: Luc on July 11, 2020, 10:38:20 ---The GFX50s had a Bayer sensor, not a X-Trans. The "problem" if any is processing X-Trans images with Adobe.
--- End quote ---
I didn’t know about the Bayer sensor. I thought all Fuji were X-Trans.
Luc:
--- Quote from: MFloyd on July 11, 2020, 11:57:41 ---I didn’t know about the Bayer sensor. I thought all Fuji were X-Trans.
--- End quote ---
That is a fully understandable misconception as Fuji promoted X-Trans a lot. Some of the cheaper XA/XT models and all medium format GFX models have Bayer sensors though.
ianwatson:
Keith, thank you very much. That is just the insight I needed. A3 is plenty big enough for me and so there is no need to worry.
Akira, thank you for the suggestion. Capture One Express could be handy for the rare files that Keith mentioned. At that price, it is at least worth a look. (I already have Iridient Developer and Photo Ninja but why not?)
Anthony:
I find that LR is definitely inferior to Capture One, Iridient and Photo Ninja for Fuji X-Trans files. It is rare to hear of someone who has moved from LR to one of those programs move back.
As you have various convertors, plus access to the free C1 Fuji program, I suggest you try various Raf files and see which convertor you prefer.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version