Author Topic: Small waterways  (Read 734 times)

Peter Forsell

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 425
  • A Cunning Linguist
Small waterways
« on: June 28, 2019, 22:50:00 »
Lenses: AI 28/2, AI 55/1.2 and 24/1.4

onnenkoski_6_pien by foppa2011, on Flickr


20190628-_P3F7935c by foppa2011, on Flickr


20190628-_P3F7836d by foppa2011, on Flickr


20190628-_P3F7938e by foppa2011, on Flickr

Airy

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 2611
    • My pics repository
Re: Small waterways
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2019, 23:30:47 »
Two radically different color temperature, two sides of the scenery - nice.

I prefer the exposure time on the 3rd shot; on the 1st one, the "silky" effect on the water is in too stark a contrast with the overall natural feeling (cold light, detailed vegetation, overall sharpness, absence of vignetting). Compare with the 3rd, where the rapid water movement is clearly expressed, possibly even more because the surface looks more "edgy".

Also, on the 1st, I would consider a very slight perspective correction, for the same reason. The shoot indeed shows that the lens was looking downwards.
Airy Magnien

Peter Forsell

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 425
  • A Cunning Linguist
Re: Small waterways
« Reply #2 on: June 29, 2019, 12:30:58 »
Two radically different color temperature, two sides of the scenery - nice.

I prefer the exposure time on the 3rd shot; on the 1st one, the "silky" effect on the water is in too stark a contrast with the overall natural feeling (cold light, detailed vegetation, overall sharpness, absence of vignetting). Compare with the 3rd, where the rapid water movement is clearly expressed, possibly even more because the surface looks more "edgy".

Also, on the 1st, I would consider a very slight perspective correction, for the same reason. The shoot indeed shows that the lens was looking downwards.

Thank you for looking and commenting.