My statement is not erroneous! Previous models of DX cameras had lower MP, so the D700 was higher MP
It is the "High MP" for a DX camera that is one of the basic culprits in the D7000 and D7100.
What I am arguing is that the D7000 is a high MP camera compared to a Df- Since it is a DX sized sensor vs. a FX, so;
Shooting the D7000 is comparable to shooting 36 MP FX camera of same vintage, very challenging! shooting a Df is like a walk in the park compared to it, it's actually difficult to make a bad image with a Df,,,
I have no doubt about my statement, if you feel my statement is erroneous fine with me 
OK, I think I see the point you're making, Eric. Let's unpack this a bit.
The D7000 was 16 MP while the preceding D90 was 12.3 MP. That's not much of a bump up, only a 14% change in linear resolution. Also, in my experience the 24 MP DX cameras (D7100, D7200, etc.) are the ones usually called
high resolution by current standards. So that was part of the reason for what I said.
But you're making an argument that size of sensor is also relevant here. This is a bit trickier because there are several obvious possible sources of blur that relate to resolution:
-Focus not being quite as good as it could be.
-Lens resolution being exceeded.
-Camera and lens movement caused by external movement (handheld, poor support, or poor technique imparting motion to the camera).
-Camera movement (perhaps with some help from lens leverage) caused by mirror or shutter slap.
The first two of these are obviously going to be worse with a smaller sensor used with an FX lens. On the other hand, with a lens native to a smaller sensor size I don't see this problem being worse as long as the MP are equal. So I think it depends.
I hadn't previously though about the third and fourth factors being affected by sensor size, so I'm going to spend a little time thinking about this and keep an open mind. There may not be a single answer that will cover all possible causes of motion. For instance, I'd think that when you're externally moving a handheld camera, what would matter would be the resolution across the actual field of view (given the same angle of view). On the other hand, if a long lens on a tripod is vibrating like a tuning fork then I can see a smaller sensor with a smaller pixel pitch being more strongly affected. Interesting question!
In the end, it looks like our disagreement was semantic. I was using
resolution in the most common sense, total resolution across the sensor. You were using
MP to mean resolution, but more in the sense of
pixel pitch. Which type of resolution to consider will depend on the question being asked.
BTW, the overall issue we're discussing here does concern me personally. While I have a D7200 which tends to be limited to the tripod, I've long considered getting a used Df. That way I'd have a lower-resolution camera with 'enough' pixels for just walking around and manually focusing with older lenses, without the rigamarole of a tripod and live view focusing.
