With regard to the LF part; the blur has been quite moderate 7 to 8 px for a 24 Mpx image; there were no "skin replacements" but some local additional Gaussian blurs added at around 24 px; some small local adjustments were made at the HF part.
For this pic. 7/9 px are just he upper limit.
If I understand correctly. You did a second FS on some areas at 24px?
or you used the same one and increased some areas to 24px?
24px is too high for this image
Eyes and theets were also exaggerated but under Lr; I do a first edit under Lr and, for the 5 or 10% of the cases, an additional processing with Ps.
Her eyes and teeth are pretty sharp in the original file. I would have just emphasized her make up. corrected her eye brows and slightly whitened her teeth.
Again, I re-emphasize this was a technical exercise, in a certain way, to find the boundaries of what is acceptable. And as I'm doing FS about two times a year, I'm not a specialist, and advice, as yours, is more than welcome.
Quite clear that it is an exercise. It is a very important exercise as technique put aside. This particular image does not have any skin issues to be addressed with FS but she has facial hair issues needing a different approach.
All is good.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/vkmun1bf1jk1m3b/_6101357%20copie.NEF?dl=0[/url]
And to end on a more humorous note (from the same series, and without FS): 
I did download your image and really like the second one. As you might know. Portraits are very much last century in the fashion world and now we have a new pompous name for it: Active Portraits. Don't laugh as I personally think it is hillarious but very true. We do not pose people anymore in terms of facial expression and only correct extreme body postures. It is more snapshot photography designer standard if this means anything. Conclusion it is Marvel comics translated on live subjects.
It sounds easy but in fact is much more difficult to nail the shot.
Which means you score higher on your second pic.
The eyes double lid- eye brows and teeth were retouched. Skin was corrected and replaced. B/G nilled as the bloke in the backgrund is intrusive.
Tonality of the pic whether brighter or darker or contrast can be changed at will based on the photographer style.
No FS was used.
Original:
Processed:
