« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: IR Barn  (Read 2448 times)

zutty

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 65
  • You ARE NikonGear
IR Barn
« on: December 29, 2016, 13:15:21 »
Logged

Bjørn Rørslett

  • Fierce Bear of the North
  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 8252
  • Oslo, Norway
Re: IR Barn
« Reply #1 on: December 29, 2016, 13:51:54 »
Something puzzles me with this photo. Is it really an infrared capture, or is the image processed to look IR?
Logged

Erik Lund

  • Global Moderator
  • **
  • Posts: 6489
  • Copenhagen
    • ErikLund.com
Re: IR Barn
« Reply #2 on: December 29, 2016, 14:06:30 »
Indeed the trees look very dark,,,
Logged
Erik Lund

Fons Baerken

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 10669
    • https://www.flickr.com/photos/fonsbaerken/
Re: IR Barn
« Reply #3 on: December 29, 2016, 14:10:50 »
Quote from: Bjørn Rørslett on December 29, 2016, 13:51:54
Something puzzles me with this photo. Is it really an infrared capture, or is the image processed to look IR?

the text under the image says d810, 14-24
Logged

Bjørn Rørslett

  • Fierce Bear of the North
  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 8252
  • Oslo, Norway
Re: IR Barn
« Reply #4 on: December 29, 2016, 14:25:08 »
So I noticed, but that in itself does not exclude 'true' IR.

The author should know the answer, though.
Logged

zutty

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 65
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: IR Barn
« Reply #5 on: December 29, 2016, 17:04:39 »
It is processed to give the illusion of IR
Logged

Bjørn Rørslett

  • Fierce Bear of the North
  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 8252
  • Oslo, Norway
Re: IR Barn
« Reply #6 on: December 29, 2016, 17:51:41 »
My suspicion was correct then. The genuine IR appearance really requires an IR capture.
Logged

Olivier

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 713
  • Olivier Anthony
Re: IR Barn
« Reply #7 on: December 29, 2016, 18:32:31 »
still, it is pretty close!
Logged

Bjørn Rørslett

  • Fierce Bear of the North
  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 8252
  • Oslo, Norway
Re: IR Barn
« Reply #8 on: December 29, 2016, 20:05:23 »
Perhaps close, but definitively no cigar :D

My perception of something amiss being was triggered immediately.
Logged

zutty

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 65
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: IR Barn
« Reply #9 on: December 29, 2016, 20:21:05 »
I do have an IR filter but as you know the 14-24 lens doesn't easily accommodate filters, so I just played around with some software filters.
Logged

Olivier

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 713
  • Olivier Anthony
Re: IR Barn
« Reply #10 on: December 29, 2016, 20:24:34 »
Cigars are not part of my many sins.
"No chocolate" would be terrible!

The dark edge on the tree line and the clouds boundaries indicate heavy processing indeed. I find the exercise quite successful though, the grass is very convincing. I agree that IR simulation is nearly impossible.

Wishing you all the best for the new year
Olivier
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »