Author Topic: Nikkor 28-50mm f/3.5 Ai-S  (Read 30642 times)

Bill De Jager

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 579
Re: Nikkor 28-50mm f/3.5 Ai-S
« Reply #60 on: October 24, 2017, 04:40:12 »
Thanks for the clarification, John.  As you said, I took the lens out for a quick spin that day.  I'd previously seen reasonable complaints here that posting of reduced-size photos doesn't really show how well a lens behaves.  Nevertheless, I should have left out the pixel-level crops from my posts given the limitations of the technique I used in taking those photos.  Including them at all was counterproductive, as they primarily reflected technique rather than lens quality.

In terms of my own skill set and practices, I think one problem here is that somehow I all along ignored the technique (which I have heard of before) of using diffused flash in the field to freeze motion for macro shots.  Indoors, sure.  Fill flash outdoors, sure.  Outdoor macro - no flash, just absolutely minimize vibration if I have the right setup with me. It's funny how we get into mental ruts sometimes.

Nevertheless, I have all the needed tools in my possession (flashes, diffusers, reversing rings).  Your suggested approach seems like a useful technique to start practicing now for those times when a tripod is not desired or practical.

JKoerner007

  • Guest
Re: Nikkor 28-50mm f/3.5 Ai-S
« Reply #61 on: October 24, 2017, 06:39:38 »
Thanks for the clarification, John.  As you said, I took the lens out for a quick spin that day.  I'd previously seen reasonable complaints here that posting of reduced-size photos doesn't really show how well a lens behaves.  Nevertheless, I should have left out the pixel-level crops from my posts given the limitations of the technique I used in taking those photos.  Including them at all was counterproductive, as they primarily reflected technique rather than lens quality.

In terms of my own skill set and practices, I think one problem here is that somehow I all along ignored the technique (which I have heard of before) of using diffused flash in the field to freeze motion for macro shots.  Indoors, sure.  Fill flash outdoors, sure.  Outdoor macro - no flash, just absolutely minimize vibration if I have the right setup with me. It's funny how we get into mental ruts sometimes.

Nevertheless, I have all the needed tools in my possession (flashes, diffusers, reversing rings).  Your suggested approach seems like a useful technique to start practicing now for those times when a tripod is not desired or practical.

So true. And good thoughts.

Funny, because I just put a reverse-ring on my 20mm AI-S this afternoon (a lens that has produced exemplary result) ... just to post a couple of Facebook nature shots ... and took "a few quick" shots of a jumping spider and a rather interesting fly, with strange eyes. Used a new (smaller) flash diffuser to give "that" for a spin.

Took a total of 48 images, all hand-held, with the new diffuser (and not wanting to trouble myself with the tripod).

The result? All 48 images went into the recycle bin  ;D

The diffuser (smaller though it may be) was too harsh ... and my desire for "quickness" (before I went back to work) cost me the detail I wanted.

As the saying goes, "Shortcuts are always the longest distance between where you are and where you want to be." :D

Hugh_3170

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 2127
  • Back in Melbourne!
Re: Nikkor 28-50mm f/3.5 Ai-S
« Reply #62 on: October 24, 2017, 07:04:25 »
An Aside  -  The British Army's "7-Ps" might apply here:

Poor Prior Planning Produces Piss Poor Performance

or

Proper Prior Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance

and so the saying goes...........   ;D
Hugh Gunn

JKoerner007

  • Guest
Re: Nikkor 28-50mm f/3.5 Ai-S
« Reply #63 on: October 31, 2017, 20:43:07 »
Here are some play shots I took at Zion National Park with the 28-50 AI-S (@ both 28 and 50mm extremes, respectively) ...

All shots on a tripod + live view + hands-off, 2-second timer:


JKoerner007

  • Guest
Re: Nikkor 28-50mm f/3.5 Ai-S
« Reply #64 on: October 31, 2017, 20:51:16 »
A couple more, @ 28mm and 50mm, respectively:

Not as good as AI-S primes, and definitely not as good as Zeiss primes, but okay nonetheless.