Author Topic: On Chinese ZWB1, ZWB2, ZWB3 lens filter problems  (Read 1927 times)

Dr Klaus Schmitt

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1005
On Chinese ZWB1, ZWB2, ZWB3 lens filter problems
« on: October 12, 2019, 10:32:40 »
Bought a few of those cheap Chinese Filters for reflected UV photography, to see if the rumor about their not so good Quality Control (QC) is true..





Well, those two out of eight filters had prominent glass striae ("streaks" commonly called)!

Read more about it here: https://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/2019/10/on-chinese-zwb1-zwb2-zwb3-filter.html
formerly known as kds315

Akira

  • Homo jezoensis
  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 12525
  • Tokyo, Japan
Re: On Chinese ZWB1, ZWB2, ZWB3 lens filter problems
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2019, 12:35:27 »
Wow, you could use them only for the light sources then...
"The eye is blind if the mind is absent." - Confucius

"Limitation is inspiration." - Akira

Dr Klaus Schmitt

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1005
Re: On Chinese ZWB1, ZWB2, ZWB3 lens filter problems
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2019, 22:09:36 »
Wow, you could use them only for the light sources then...

Even better, I get them replaced... ;-)
formerly known as kds315

Akira

  • Homo jezoensis
  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 12525
  • Tokyo, Japan
Re: On Chinese ZWB1, ZWB2, ZWB3 lens filter problems
« Reply #3 on: October 13, 2019, 01:31:09 »
Even better, I get them replaced... ;-)

Hope you will get the proper replacements!  They seem to be equivalents of Hoya U-3X0 series.
"The eye is blind if the mind is absent." - Confucius

"Limitation is inspiration." - Akira

arthurking83

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 240
  • Good to be back on NikonGear
Re: On Chinese ZWB1, ZWB2, ZWB3 lens filter problems
« Reply #4 on: October 13, 2019, 07:13:22 »
.....

Well, those two out of eight filters had prominent glass striae ("streaks" commonly called)!

....

Does this mean that the other 6 filters were properly OK?
Or did they just suffer to a lesser degree, not worthy of commenting upon?

If the former, then 1 in 4(25% failure rate) is probably too high a risk to take.
Arthur