There are nearly limitless number of candidate Nikkors. Some fade from memory after not being used recently. This reflects more the human mindset and functionality than their optical excellence per se.
The change of the 105/2.5 optics to the newer 'gauss' configuration and soon thereafter, introduction of multi-coating, made the 'K' and AI versions of this old Nikkor classic into terrific performers. More bang for the buck as our friends across the pond would call it. My preference is for the AI as it has very precise focusing and lovely handling on the Df. The 'K' is optically more or less identical except for having f/32 as its minimum aperture. Either version is a first choice companion for any df.
I never was a fan of the 18/3.5, but it admittedly does function pretty well on the Df. However, in this focal class I am partial to the 18/4 both for its gentle optical 'drawing' with pastel colours and its nice handling and excellent workmanship. the 18/4 is excellent when shooting into strong light sources too (provided its front is immaculate, but that can be said for all wide lenses). It also has low geometric distortion as far as wide angles go. An example is presented below.
Regarding the zoom lenses, the 80-200 f/4.5 is not bad, but again I never felt it to be excellent with the Df, just merely very good. The same goes for the f/4 model, but it has better performance at the widest apertures, at least evaluated from my copies of these lenses (I have several of the f/4.5s). I'm sure protests will be heard regarding this description of these two zoom Nikkors, but never mind. If one is pleased with either lens, by all means use it extensively and ignore my comment. The impressions of such lenses are never to be regarded as set in stone.