Far Below Any Sane Assumption

[Ian R]

I can feel the scene, I can smell the sea, I have been there, done that. Must get back to dover to see the sites on my old slides in real. Thank you Ian!

Thanks Frank. These photos were taken in West Bay - in Dorset - so also on the South Coast.

[Chip Chipowski]

Eddie - nice looking cupboard

This one is from the file cabinets, before the morning rush

D200 IR @3200 10.5mm FE @f/2.8

[Erik Lund]

He he nice one, I see I'm not the only one with paper files 😲😲😲

[ColinM]

Bruno:

The cat is nice, but you might try to shoot a graphically more pleasing picture of her...

I don't know if it was intentional, but I saw Bruno's name, then the subject and mind jumped to "Schrödinger's cat"......
(sorry)

[Bruno Schroder]

  I've solved the equation.  The cat is still alive 

[zuglufttier]

Nikon D40 at ISO3200

[Akira]

Olympus OM-D E-M5 MkII, Nikkor-Q C auto 200/4.0, ISO6400 handheld, heavily cropped.

[nancyr]

Three looks at the mess on my office floor with cameras at hand.

D200, 50/1.8, 3200
D5200, 50/1.8, 25600, MF
Panasonic GF1, 20/1.7, 3200

So the "5" in the 5200 means I can add 5000 ISO? 

[Peter Forsell]

ISO one million. Not straight out of camera, since this was done by 3.3 stop underexposure combined with 3.3 stop push from an ISO 102,400 image. Below is the SOOC version without the push. Something somewhere bastardized the EXIF, since Flickr only shows 65535 


Underexposure + push




Same image sooc

[Øivind Tøien]

The Nikon 1 AW-1 in the dark at max ISO 6400 1/5sec exposure, pulled +0.3 stops, and contrast increased and sharpening applied. Some "better quality 2013" noise reduction applied in CNX2, particularly for chroma noise. The light pollution from the sodium lights is about the worst possible with respect to color balance vs. noise.  The bent tree just came down today (It has been like that for several years) so this image from late yesterday is the last one...





More images with AW1 at ISO 6400 (accidental) can be found here: http://nikongear.net/revival/index.php/topic,1665.new.html#new



I now see that the thread was meant to show results without editing, so here is the original conversion from CNX2 without other adjustment than resizing; not as pretty as the one with noise reduction applied...





And here is the ISO 6400 shot that made me forget to change back to normal ISO (straight conversion):



And here is an optimized ISO 320 shot:

[Darrell C]

at our local park museum

 

[Bruno Schroder]

Hi Darrell, what' s the camera and ISO?

[Darrell C]

Hi Darrell, what' s the camera and ISO?

sorry Bruno was an ISO 800

[Frank Fremerey]

I made two mistakes:

1) I forgot to crank up the ISO ... it is only ISO4000 on a D3
2) I really wanted to show the golden glow of this shirt / skirt / gown whatever, I am not Lagerfeld
3) But I edited it and puped it up, so I managed to make it look shitty after all

...and I preserved the golden glow. The lens was too good I guess ... Mikro Nikkor 4/200...

it is a pano made from many a shot.

[Jan Anne]

200k!

Imagine someone had told you 10 years ago.

I feel we should dig more into pushing the envelope.

200K is so 2000 and late, here's Bjørn at ISO409600

Sony a7S & Zeiss 35/1.4 FE, Germany 2015