Author Topic: Medium Format for Everyone?  (Read 2259 times)

Michael Erlewine

  • Close-Up Photographer
  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 2064
  • Close-Up with APO
    • Spirit Grooves
Medium Format for Everyone?
« on: July 07, 2016, 18:16:37 »
Well, almost medium-format and at a price that is affordable, $1799.95. This would be the Pentax K1, when used in Pixel-Shift Mode, often called SuperRes Mode. I found it hard to believe when I first heard about it, but very believable, because I had previously owned a Sony A7s, with its oversized photo-sites, and I know what gathering light in larger wells can do. Unfortunately, the A7s with a 12 Mpx sensor, while usable for video, is too small a sensor for the close-up work I do. I sent it back.

Now, here is a camera doing what amounts to the same thing as the Sony A7s, in this case gathering four-times as much information for each photo-site and then combining it. The contribution of purity of color (independent of apochromatic corrections) to what we perceive as “sharpness” is a topic I have been researching for some years. Here was an opportunity to put it to the test and the Pentax K1 (when in pixel-shift mode) passes with flying colors. While 36 Mpx may not quite be in MF-sensor territory, with the help of pixel-shift, there is no doubt that this technology makes MF quality accessible at a rate that most photographers can actually afford.

Over the years I have surprised myself at finding that I am not brand loyal, but rather I am “results-loyal,” and will gladly abandon my most favorite equipment in favor of something substantially better. For years I thought that the Voigtlander 125mm f/2.5 APO-Lathar was the best all-around macro lens on the planet. And then along came the Zeiss Otus lenses, which are not even macro or close-up, and (most of the time) the CV-125 APO-Lanthar now sits on the shelf, etc.

As for the Pentax k1, after stumbling around with its interface while holding my nose, I finally gave that up and settled into iguring out how to get what I want from this particular camera system. I will sometime write a longish blog about the pitfalls and work-arounds (as I see them) to learning to use the Pentax K1.

I have learned the basics of getting images that I need out of the K1 as regards its SuperRes mode, and while not yet pure MF-like, I can see that I will get there. Lloyd Chambers (Diglloyd.com) points out that he feels the overall effect of the Pentax K1 is similar to something like a 54 Mpx sensor. I can’t speak to that, but I continue to be impressed by this camera. Perhaps the most revealing thing I could share with you is that I, who only do close-up work, am seriously considering getting into landscape photography, solely because of the K1’s SuperRes mode.

So, here are a few images from the K1 in SuperRes Mode, taken with the Voigtlander 90mm APO f/3.5 lens that, while not that special, tell me that with a little work, I can make this little K1-engine do what MF cameras do, at least I think so. Zerene Stacker used.
MichaelErlewine.smugmug.com, Daily Blog at https://www.facebook.com/MichaelErlewine. main site: SpiritGrooves.net, https://www.youtube.com/user/merlewine, Founder: MacroStop.com, All-Music Guide, All-Movie Guide, Classic Posters.com, Matrix Software, DharmaGrooves.com

Dr Klaus Schmitt

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Medium Format for Everyone?
« Reply #1 on: July 08, 2016, 21:40:28 »
Pretty amazing results Michael! Very tempting...
formerly known as kds315

Frank Fremerey

  • engineering art
  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 12541
  • Bonn, Germany
Re: Medium Format for Everyone?
« Reply #2 on: July 08, 2016, 22:18:04 »
stunning results. Whenever I think he cannot get better he finds another path to even more perfection.
You are out there. You and your camera. You can shoot or not shoot as you please. Discover the world, Your world. Show it to us. Or we might never see it.

Me: https://youpic.com/photographer/frankfremerey/

Eb

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 102
    • pbase.com/emueller
Re: Medium Format for Everyone?
« Reply #3 on: July 08, 2016, 22:19:47 »
Wouldn't pixel shift be impractical?  For stacking shots, in nature, it is hard enough given slightest wind movement, and then comes along all the pixel shifted exposures to content with and slow things down and degrade.  I think the same reservation can be made when making landscapes, pixel shifting.  IMO, this technology is fine for things that are "glued," such as architecture, studio, still life, etc.  I'll trust your perceptions of quality, Michael, but, at this size of display, it makes no difference to me.  Sometimes, I'm back yearning for the 12 mpx. (or less) days.  (I should add, on second thought, that ignorance was blissful!)   :)
Eb Mueller
British Columbia, Canada
http://www.pbase.com/emueller