Author Topic: BG-3 Crane Estate  (Read 805 times)

bobfriedman

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 1263
  • Massachusetts, USA
BG-3 Crane Estate
« on: June 24, 2018, 22:43:03 »
Nikon D800 UV-VIS-IR ,AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR ,BG-3
1/250s f/8.0 at 16.0mm iso100


Nikon D800 UV-VIS-IR,AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR ,BG-3
1/160s f/8.0 at 16.0mm iso125


Nikon D800 UV-VIS-IR,AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR ,BG-3
1/400s f/5.6 at 16.0mm iso100


Nikon D800 UV-VIS-IR,AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR ,BG-3
1/320s f/8.0 at 16.0mm iso125


Nikon D800 ,AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR ,BG-3
1/250s f/8.0 at 16.0mm iso125
Robert L Friedman, Massachusetts, USA
www.pbase.com/bobfriedman

Birna Rørslett

  • Global Moderator
  • **
  • Posts: 5631
  • A lesser fierce bear of the North
Re: BG-3 Crane Estate
« Reply #1 on: June 24, 2018, 23:26:55 »
Looks like an excellent combination of filter and lens alike.

bobfriedman

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 1263
  • Massachusetts, USA
Re: BG-3 Crane Estate
« Reply #2 on: June 24, 2018, 23:37:48 »
well now that i found that the 16-35/4G is IR capable i can't help using it (after a friend let me try it)... but i feel that the 17-35/2.8D is a better lens.. both require significant distortion correction at the widest angle..

if you know of something wider with filter threads that is IR capable please let me know.
Robert L Friedman, Massachusetts, USA
www.pbase.com/bobfriedman

golunvolo

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 7228
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: BG-3 Crane Estate
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2018, 23:46:37 »
Wonderful results

Seapy

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 830
Re: BG-3 Crane Estate
« Reply #4 on: June 25, 2018, 09:27:32 »
Bob, I have and use (for IR) both the 18-35 and the 18-105 (DX), although I do believe the 17-35 would be a better lens but not sure it would show at this resolution?
Robert C. P.
South Cumbria, UK