Thanks for the kind comment Nasos. I think the telescope route could be a very slippery economic slope. It would then quickly require a dedicated mount beyond the little Skytracker that I currently have, and with limited use compared to using those funds on camera optics. Currently I find part of the joy in astrophotography to see what I maximally can get out of the equipment that I already have. I am curious what considerably more exposures and drizzling (similar principle as pixel shift) together with proper use of the software can do, although I do not expect any miracles there.
I just sold my Tamron 150-600 g1 to go for Nikon 200-500 E 5.6 due to Z incompatibility and I wonder if it’s good to take the telescope route..
Anyway I have to explore multiple exposures and software first as you mention
Thank you
