NikonGear'23

Images => Critique => Topic started by: Grahame Hamblin on May 09, 2017, 00:30:05

Title: table set
Post by: Grahame Hamblin on May 09, 2017, 00:30:05

comments please

Title: Re: table set
Post by: Fons Baerken on May 09, 2017, 09:15:23

Some type of Geranium or cranesbill, looks like a PS editing process the background looks declarified.Why?

Title: Re: table set
Post by: Grahame Hamblin on May 09, 2017, 10:42:24

I did put a fairly heavy  vignette around it.it was also taken against a dark background
Thanks Grahame

Title: Re: table set
Post by: elsa hoffmann on May 09, 2017, 19:56:53

Grahame, beautiful setting. Your images is very under exposed. I assume you tried to get the background as dark as possible?

Title: Re: table set
Post by: Grahame Hamblin on May 09, 2017, 21:14:15

thanks Elsa i will go back and have a play
Grahame

Title: Re: table set
Post by: pluton on May 10, 2017, 06:13:54

Quote from: Grahame Hamblin on May 09, 2017, 21:14:15

thanks Elsa i will go back and have a play
Grahame

Fading flowers in fading light.. I like it. I assumed that the density was a deliberate choice, since not all existing light is bright, even though camera meters want us to make it so.  Focus falloff seems natural, and the vignette did not register it's presence to me.  Nicely done!

Title: Re: table set
Post by: Grahame Hamblin on May 10, 2017, 07:48:10

thanks Pluton i have since cropped the right side out i think an improvement

Title: Re: table set
Post by: Grahame Hamblin on May 11, 2017, 11:28:19

did a rework i think its better who knowes
Grahame