NikonGear'23

Images => Critique => Topic started by: zutty on February 25, 2017, 04:59:13

Title: Bubbles
Post by: zutty on February 25, 2017, 04:59:13

(https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2857/32943983652_35f705e6f3_b.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/Sc9wA9)D610#2-K.Cove #8__14b (https://flic.kr/p/Sc9wA9) by J T (https://www.flickr.com/photos/drummist53/), on Flickr

Title: Re: Bubbles
Post by: Bjørn Rørslett on February 25, 2017, 08:26:23

The image probably would improve by not applying the hackneyed filter.

Title: Re: Bubbles
Post by: zutty on February 25, 2017, 10:34:43

OK

(https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/704/32254731774_a6dc596060_b.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/R9eW25)D610#2-K.Cove #8__14a (https://flic.kr/p/R9eW25) by J T (https://www.flickr.com/photos/drummist53/), on Flickr

Title: Re: Bubbles
Post by: Thomas G on February 25, 2017, 12:57:23

Ya, much better.

Title: Re: Bubbles
Post by: Akira on February 25, 2017, 17:28:02

Another vote for the one without the effect filter.  I like its Salvador-Dali-like surreal mood.  An excellent capture.

Title: Re: Bubbles
Post by: Bjørn Rørslett on February 25, 2017, 17:31:30

The obvious improvement, which is only obvious in hindsight, is going belly-down on the ground to make the bubble-blower and the bubbles free of the background entirely.

Title: Re: Bubbles
Post by: Jack Dahlgren on February 25, 2017, 18:51:43

I agree that a lower angle would let the bubbles truly float.

Title: Re: Bubbles
Post by: John Geerts on February 25, 2017, 20:53:50

Yes, without filter much better. The point is also, the colours, and the forms and the action  are so uncommon, that a filter can 'destroy' the 'photographic' effect and may turn it into a comic.