NikonGear'23

Gear Talk => Other => Topic started by: Jakov Minić on August 11, 2015, 16:37:48

Title: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on August 11, 2015, 16:37:48
Dear All,

I have many camera bags.
But somehow, I am not really happy with any of them.
During our recent Slovenia trip I used an ordinary Crumpler gym bag, and found many benefits. Easy and comfortable to carry, and in one single movement, unzip, and all your gear available.
Ever since, I have been searching for a bag that would suit my needs.
The perfect camera bag for me would be the Ortlieb Travel Zip.
The only problem with it is that it's not a camera bag, hence no padding and padded dividers, and lack of internal pockets for bits and pieces.
What does this Ortlieb have that I like so much and I haven't managed to find in other camera bags:

- two handles and a shoulder strap;
- no flap that gets in my way whenever I want to grab my gear;
- the one handle on the flap on Domke bags are a hazard. I already see myself spilling all my gear out of it when picking up the bag without the flap being strapped into position (and uncomfortable for carrying);
- the waterproof feature is definitely an advantage, but I would be able to live with weather proofing.

In case you know of a camera bag that looks just like the Ortlieb, and that is in fact in a shape of a gym bag, please let me know.
Alternatively, if you have any ideas on how I can pad the Ortlieb, I am even prepared for that :)

Thanks, Jakov


Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: RobOK on August 11, 2015, 16:58:46
This may be more "messenger" than you want...

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/peak-design/the-everyday-messenger-a-bag-for-cameras-and-essen

It's not available until later in the year, but I saw one in person and was impressed enough to order one. I like the laptop/camera combo for planes, etc.  Your needs might be different.
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: rosko on August 11, 2015, 17:04:45
.I am going to follow your thread, Jakov, as I have never found something satisfactory neither.

I use a normal rucksack where I put what I need but each lens are (separately !) inside a suitable neoprene bag.

I would prefer a sling bag, for quick access with a well padded shoulder strap.

I think is better to have 2 different ones depending the trip, local or far (flight).

Cheers, Francis

Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Bjørn Rørslett on August 11, 2015, 17:05:53
Buy some padding inserts for your Ortlieb. Oh man, that lime green colour is cool. One must wear shades at all times to match.

I think a car is the perfect camera bag, by the way.
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on August 11, 2015, 17:14:19
This may be more "messenger" than you want...

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/peak-design/the-everyday-messenger-a-bag-for-cameras-and-essen

It's not available until later in the year, but I saw one in person and was impressed enough to order one. I like the laptop/camera combo for planes, etc.  Your needs might be different.

Thanks Rob!

The bag is promising, and is probably the best I have seen thus far.
Still, it has one carrying handle and a flap. Whenever I wanted to reach for gear I had to use one hand for holding the flap. And let me not repeat what I already said, it is not comfortable and hazardous :)

Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on August 11, 2015, 17:23:15
.I am going to follow your thread, Jakov, as I have never found something satisfactory neither.

I use a normal rucksack where I put what I need but each lens are (separately !) inside a suitable neoprene bag.

I would prefer a sling bag, for quick access with a well padded shoulder strap.

I think is better to have 2 different ones depending the trip, local or far (flight).

Cheers, Francis

Francis, I have two Crumpler camera rucksacks, a Crumpler shoulder bag, a Lowepro urban reporter 350 shoulder bag, and two Lowepro Pro Rollers 100 and 200 for air travel (but with new carry on air travel constraints, probably not suitable any longer).
I love the Crumplers for the design, comfort, and quality. The Lowepro bags are top notch too.
The problem I have with the shoulder bags that I have (apart from the flap and one carrying handle) is that they are not comfortable after a while.
The rucksacks are very comfortable, but whenever you want to reach for something you need to lay them down...


Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on August 11, 2015, 17:24:37
Buy some padding inserts for your Ortlieb. Oh man, that lime green colour is cool. One must wear shades at all times to match.

I think a car is the perfect camera bag, by the way.

Bjørn I agree with you on both accounts.
Just help me with the purchase of the padding :)

Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jan Anne on August 11, 2015, 18:10:01
Looks like an awesome travel bag, not so sure it would suffice as a camera shoulder bag to walk around with all day with its round profile.

Still extremely happy with the Billingham Headly Pro shoulder bag which I use almost everyday:
- Camera bag: room for one body with 3 medium sized lenses
- Transit bag: Same camera gear but will squeeze in a MacBook Air, charger, etc
- Work: Ultrabook in neoprene cover, papers, charger, office stuff, rain jacker, etc (insert taken out)
- Daily use

It's an expensive bag but I'm using almost everyday and it still looks good after years of use.
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: elsa hoffmann on August 11, 2015, 18:46:00
There is a saying about camera bags - you never have the right one.
and there is a saying about studios - you never have a big enough one.
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Chip Chipowski on August 11, 2015, 19:23:47
Great thread!  This is one of life's great unsolvable questions.  For me, part of the problem is figuring out what camera stuff to bring along - let alone how to carry it.  I have recently purchased a Pelican 1150 hard case and one of their padded dividers.  Works pretty well for me - the size forces me to prioritize, although you can always supplement with a few extra lens pouches.  I also like using a waterproof backpack like this http://www.rei.com/product/868841/seattle-sports-wanderer-dry-daypack-special-buy?cm_mmc=cse_PLA-_-pla-_-8688410001&mr:trackingCode=B9B8AF50-ABAF-E311-90E9-BC305BF82162&mr:referralID=NA&mr:device=c&mr:adType=plaonline&mr:ad=55518665680&mr:keyword=&mr:match=&mr:filter=70498161520&msid=cl1t0Ijr_dc|pcrid|55518665680|&lsft=cm_mmc:cse_PLA&gclid=CO75ka72n8cCFUuTfgod32sDBw (http://www.rei.com/product/868841/seattle-sports-wanderer-dry-daypack-special-buy?cm_mmc=cse_PLA-_-pla-_-8688410001&mr:trackingCode=B9B8AF50-ABAF-E311-90E9-BC305BF82162&mr:referralID=NA&mr:device=c&mr:adType=plaonline&mr:ad=55518665680&mr:keyword=&mr:match=&mr:filter=70498161520&msid=cl1t0Ijr_dc|pcrid|55518665680|&lsft=cm_mmc:cse_PLA&gclid=CO75ka72n8cCFUuTfgod32sDBw) and throwing in lens pouches + camera as needed.
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Almass on August 11, 2015, 19:51:47
Padded camera bag inserts to tailor your Ortlieb,,,,,

http://www.ebay.com/bhp/camera-bag-insert
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: chris dees on August 11, 2015, 19:59:19
IMHO there's no one-fit-all camera bag.
I use different kind of bags for different outings.
Most are Think Tank, but I have Tamrac, Crumpler, Kata and Dome as well.
The Dome is the smallest for 1 camera and some MF-lenses or a Nikon 1 set.
The Kata is the largest, it fits a 600 + camera and a 200-400 + camera and then there's room for a lot more. :D
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on August 11, 2015, 22:50:34
Padded camera bag inserts to tailor your Ortlieb,,,,,

http://www.ebay.com/bhp/camera-bag-insert

Almass, thanks a bunch!
These Ciesta inserts look like something that would fit...
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on August 11, 2015, 22:51:08
IMHO there's no one-fit-all camera bag.
I use different kind of bags for different outings.
Most are Think Tank, but I have Tamrac, Crumpler, Kata and Dome as well.
The Dome is the smallest for 1 camera and some MF-lenses or a Nikon 1 set.
The Kata is the largest, it fits a 600 + camera and a 200-400 + camera and then there's room for a lot more. :D

Chris, when I grow up, I want to be just like you :)
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: PedroS on August 11, 2015, 23:41:02
 8) no camera bag is THE bag...
I have other issues, as I much like to photograph, I hate to carry the gear... and I really not like (hate?) the small cameras and so on... so a dilema here...
So I just use bags to transfer gear from home/studio to car, and then from car to the shoot...
Must have on my bags:
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Gary on August 12, 2015, 01:02:43
I've been using Domke for decades.

(http://www.garyayala.com/Photography/Black-Whites/i-74DmtWN/0/O/Moi-%40-Fire---W.jpg)
My left arm is resting on top of an original F-2 ... a true original, one that was sewn together in Jim's garage.

I find the F-2 to be very fast getting in and out of, very comfy to wear all day long (the soft bag conforms to your body), they hold a ton of stuff and they are well made.

When I can get by with less stuff I use the Domke 3-X. The insert from the F-2 fits perfectly in the 3-X, holding four lenses (or three lens and a wrap of Fig Newtons ... or ... two lenses w/ a wrap of Fig Newtons and a travel cup of coffee, black no cream or sugar).

If I want even less space, I have a Tamrac Sling bag, which give me a narrower frontal profile (if that is possible).   
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Bjørn Rørslett on August 12, 2015, 01:20:17
Been using Domke bags for many years. When they wear down too far, for example, holes develop big enough to allow a 45P drop through, I chuck it away and start on a new.

Besides being able to hold a lot of gear, they double as knee protector, bean bag, or pillow if I need a quick nap in the field.
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on August 12, 2015, 01:21:19
8) no camera bag is THE bag...
I have other issues, as I much like to photograph, I hate to carry the gear... and I really not like (hate?) the small cameras and so on... so a dilema here...
So I just use bags to transfer gear from home/studio to car, and then from car to the shoot...
Must have on my bags:
  • butterfly openings
  • light, should I say light?, prefer the gura ones, that are made from sailing tissue
  • whenever possible wheels, I have tailored a small cart to gura bags...
  • water resistant

Pedro, I couldn't agree with you more.
I wheel my gear whenever possible.
But for a day excursion (away from my car) and into the fields I need to find something practical, multi-purposeful and funky :)

Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on August 12, 2015, 01:37:24
Gary and Bjørn, you know that I am very fond of you, and I admire your photography, but I am sorry to say: those Domke bags are extremely ugly, and I would not let a single donkey see me carrying one of those :D

Bjørn, when you nestle your knee gently on to a Domke, what do you do with the gear that's inside?

Don't get me wrong, I am certain that Domke bags are sturdy, comfortable and well designed. Not the cheapest bag around either... Just not my cup of black coffee, no cream or sugar :)

I have ordered the lemon-green Ortlieb in the meantime.
Will post my findings when it arrives... and that doesn't mean that I have seized the search for an ideal photo bag!


Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Øivind Tøien on August 12, 2015, 03:54:58
I recently got a Thinktank Speedfreak shoulder/beltpack. It is more comfortable to wear than a shoulder bag, however I am spoilt with respect to comfort and easy access to equipment by the Thinktank modular components, which is my preference for longer excursions/hiking with a regular backpack. The disadvantage of the modular approach is that is a lot more work to get the components on and off (I prefer to use shoulder straps in addition to the belt attachment); thus my purchase of the Speedfreak for shorter excursions. It is not as easy to rotate front - back as I hoped, but it depends on of how much the belt is tightened. The internals should have come with more Velcro for attaching dividers, it is geared towards dividing the internals into 3 main compartments, so it is due for some modifications to add an extra divider between smaller AIS primes on on side. While all the ThinkTank components come with rain covers, I have never used them. The outer fabric is lined with an internal membrane that is pretty water proof, so there is just a little bit seeping in thought the seams.

I chose the the Speedfreak as a compromise in size; I am just able to stuff it into one of my Ortlieb rear bike panniers, so that I can have a good deal of equipment easily accessible on shorter trips with my bicycle. Which brings up the question how much equipment are you usually carrying in your bag -lenses/ one or two bodies? For most easy access the Speedfreak will fit one body, 300mm +TC on one side, One AIS prime + an adapter under the middle compartment, 12-24mm on the body, and 3 smaller/middle sized  lenses  on the right side. It is possible to stuff it with a few more lenses and my AW1 for travel/transport, but then access becomes difficult for the parts at the bottom. The front compartment has room for some filters/spare batteries and a blower. My brother has the bigger Speedracer, where he is able to fit a second K5II body attached to his 300mm lens, but for lighter excursions and travel he seems to prefer the Thinktank Changeup belt pack.
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: pluton on August 12, 2015, 09:17:46
Dear All,
I have many camera bags.
But somehow, I am not really happy with any of them.
Thanks, Jakov

Thus, with this statement, you have encapsulated the entire universe of camera bag selection, use, and ownership.
I would be tempted to obtain a copy of the gym bag, and seek professional assistance designing and adding padding, pockets and compartments.
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on August 12, 2015, 09:22:51
My apologies to Bjørn and Gary for inexcusably pronouncing their Domke bags extremely ugly.
I am sorry!
I should show more respect for you guys!
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Bjørn Rørslett on August 12, 2015, 09:31:56
Jakov, I'll remind you of that later.

"Bjørn, when you nestle your knee gently on to a Domke, what do you do with the gear that's inside?"

Use the flap if the bag is heavily loaded - usually there is softer stuff stored inside the flap pouch.
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on August 12, 2015, 09:45:41
Dear Øivind,

The Thinktank Speedfreak looks really comfortable and handy.
I would definitely consider buying such a bag. I am certain the belt alleviates the weight off the shoulders and you can go on for hours without feeling burdened.

However.

Why is it that no camera bag manufacturer ever designed a bag that has two handles for carrying it. All handbags that I know of have two handles. Why is it different for a camera bag?
Most of the time it's a small and uncomfortable noose that tilts the bags side ways, or has a tendency to rip the top off. Those same handles can be used as shoulder straps.

Also, why is it that they invent camera bag rain covers?
The bag is a protection for your gear, yet it cannot protect itself from rain!?
How protective is it if you need or they recommend to cover it whenever it rains?
Good luck accessing your gear then. Or is there an overall designer assumption that nobody shoots in the rain?
It started raining, get your rain cover out and protect the protection of your gear. Rain can be nasty. Forget about accessing your gear again until you reach a dry location. Are you crazy, surely you are not going to risk getting your camera wet...

:D


Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on August 12, 2015, 09:48:08
Dear All,
I have many camera bags.
But somehow, I am not really happy with any of them.
Thanks, Jakov

Thus, with this statement, you have encapsulated the entire universe of camera bag selection, use, and ownership.
I would be tempted to obtain a copy of the gym bag, and seek professional assistance designing and adding padding, pockets and compartments.

Pluton, where does one seek professional assistance when it comes to adding padding?
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Øivind Tøien on August 12, 2015, 11:42:10
Dear Øivind,
...
Also, why is it that they invent camera bag rain covers?
The bag is a protection for your gear, yet it cannot protect itself from rain!?
How protective is it if you need or they recommend to cover it whenever it rains?
Good luck accessing your gear then. Or is there an overall designer assumption that nobody shoots in the rain?
It started raining, get your rain cover out and protect the protection of your gear. Rain can be nasty. Forget about accessing your gear again until you reach a dry location. Are you crazy, surely you are not going to risk getting your camera wet...

:D

Jakov, I am absolutely with you with respect to the rain covers. I  leave them at home, they do not seem necessary. In a few of the lens cases it is stored at the bottom and works as padding, so I leave some of those in (The lens cases have drawstring closure, which do not really close completely so it could come handy there in an emergency). The only situation I could think of if is an emergency where one were surprised by absolutely torrential rain, but then I think one would look for other ways to protect oneself and equipment. (Exterior would probably be maximally soaked by the time one managed to get all those rain covers on.... .) Of course in the ideal world everything would be completely water proof like the Ortlieb bags (i.e. canoe/kayak proof), but then one has to deal with tight waterproof zippers or fold-over closures. It is all about accessibility etc.

I do like the central placement of the handle on the lid my ThinkTank holsters; however I think a second handle on the bigger belt packs would get in the way. For a central handle on the lid of the belt packs one would have to loose the central zipper (which is semi-waterproof). There is some risk as to what would happen if one were to quickly grab the bag by the handle while the lid is open. (Some of the same risk is present with the current position of the handle at the front as you pointed out.)

I side with others that the Ortlieb Travel Zip looks too wide at the bottom to be comfortable to wear as a shoulder bag filled with heavy photo equipment. I think the closer to the body stuff can be worn the more comfortable. It also looks a lot bigger than any of the belt packs. For general storage on a kayak /canoe trip it would be great.
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Almass on August 12, 2015, 13:31:35
The rain cover is not only for the rain....or the bag.

I never ever used it as a rain cover as usually a supermarket plastic bag does the same effect.....and use the rain cover on my head  :D

However. for wind and blowing sand. you definitely want to protect your bag as much as your gear as the damned thing gets into all the nooks and crannies of the bag and play havoc with the zippers.

Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on August 12, 2015, 14:58:15

I side with others that the Ortlieb Travel Zip looks too wide at the bottom to be comfortable to wear as a shoulder bag filled with heavy photo equipment. I think the closer to the body stuff can be worn the more comfortable. It also looks a lot bigger than any of the belt packs. For general storage on a kayak /canoe trip it would be great.

This is why I am looking for a bag with two handles that can be used to carry the heavy load on your shoulder.
Then the bag is very close to the body and the momentum doesn't exist. At least that is how I have been carrying my gym bag ever since I was a teenager :)
I agree it could be uncomfortable to use the shoulder strap alone for longer periods of time.
The possibility to carry the bag in different ways (instead of only one way) is an advantage I am looking for.
It won't hurt if it becomes a multi-purpose bag too :)

Perhaps the Ortlieb is sturdy enough and it won't need additional padding? If the lenses are in their pouches, the camera body is mostly in my hands anyway...

Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on August 12, 2015, 15:04:33
The rain cover is not only for the rain....or the bag.

I never ever used it as a rain cover as usually a supermarket plastic bag does the same effect.....and use the rain cover on my head  :D

However. for wind and blowing sand. you definitely want to protect your bag as much as your gear as the damned thing gets into all the nooks and crannies of the bag and play havoc with the zippers.

Almass, I agree, cover your head first and then take care of the rest.
Whilst the rain cover can be used for additional protection (like a supermarket plastic bag), I would like designers to invent a bag that doesn't need extra help.
I would like to see a bag that can survive on its own. Today's camera bags are not cheap products, and the market is huge. The technology must be there to make one :)

Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Gary on August 12, 2015, 16:00:54
My apologies to Bjørn and Gary for inexcusably pronouncing their Domke bags extremely ugly.
I am sorry!
I should show more respect for you guys!

LOL!  Oh Please Jakov ... I cannot speak for Bjørn, but I am not insulted by your remark of calling my camera bag ugly.  It is a camera bag, it looks like a camera bag, it functions like a camera bag. If I was concerned about looks, I'd hire a model or aspiring actress to carry my gear (there are plenty of them out here).  8)

I have also used my Domke as a bean bag (in lieu of a tripod), a front bumper ramming my way through crowds, a shield against those pesky stray pieces of shrapnel and a pillow (you sorta punch the lenses around until you get the support where you need it). Hell, I've even slept with my Domke bag (others have claimed to have slept with my Domke bag, but I don't believe them).

Gary

PS- Bjørn and I both think you're ugly.  :P
G
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: John Geerts on August 12, 2015, 16:03:11
I recognize this problem, and even more urgent if the perfect solution, a car trunk, is not available ;)

I use several bags, especially shoulderbags, as the backbags are only for 'transportation' and quit unworkable' although I have Lowepro slingshot' which can serve fine as it takes a lot of stuff, and the zipper can be opened with one hand while slinging the bag to the hips.  ;)

But for shoulderbags: (Bought them cheap for a few euro's at second hand stores, during the past 5 years)

1)  Delsey 'gopix'  -  just zip open, and use. There is room for a body with medium size lens and extra lens.
2)  a Dörr Adventure - with a very minor flap (not really in use) but with a zipper.  That one takes two bodies D700 - average sized lenses, and lots of room for other stuff. Works great in exchanging rapidly to different body/lens
3)  a leather Vanguard, a former film-bag. Takes a body with a long lens (70-200, 200mm, 300mm)  - opens with two buttons only.
4)  the same applies to a Samsonite, take two buttons to open up.
5-6-7) different shoulder bags to carry just one body with different sized lenses.

Number 1, 2 and 5 are used most frequent.

All of them can be combined too of course.  Photo's can be made to visualize the bags and different situations ;)
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Gary on August 12, 2015, 16:06:10
Dear All,
I have many camera bags.
But somehow, I am not really happy with any of them.
Thanks, Jakov

Thus, with this statement, you have encapsulated the entire universe of camera bag selection, use, and ownership.
I would be tempted to obtain a copy of the gym bag, and seek professional assistance designing and adding padding, pockets and compartments.

Pluton, where does one seek professional assistance when it comes to adding padding?

Out here in the colonies, one would enlist a shoe repair shop for simple sewing modifications for ugly camera bags. (You wouldn't want to modify a good looking camera bag ... you may chip your fingernail polish.)   ;)
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: pluton on August 12, 2015, 19:49:12
Gary, I live in the same [former]colony, and my first thought also was shoe repair places: are the 'go to' for zippers, straps, velcro, and may, depending on the individual place, be helpful with creating dividers and pockets.
Beyond that, there are---I'm convinced--- craftspeople that specialize in customizing bags and luggage, but they are hard to find.
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Gary on August 12, 2015, 19:53:54
Gary, I live in the same [former]colony, and my first thought also was shoe repair places: are the 'go to' for zippers, straps, velcro, and may, depending on the individual place, be helpful with creating dividers and pockets.
Beyond that, there are---I'm convinced--- craftspeople that specialize in customizing bags and luggage, but they are hard to find.

I think back in the old country they're called cobblers.  ;)
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Andrea B. on August 12, 2015, 23:00:00
2-handled camera bag: Shootsac Tote & Shoot Camera Bag (http://www.shootsac.com/collections/camera-bags)
The bag fits up under your arm nicely like a gym bag.
It also has a clip on shoulder strap available.
The bag weighs itself 3.5 pounds.
The fabric is water-repellant.

Recently I was able to put all of the following
inside this bag due to its unusual construction.

Df + 24-70/2.8 AFS in side pocket with back down, lens up.
D810 + 70-200/4 AFS also in side pocket with back down, lens up.
and inside the bag was a matrix of the following
16-25/4G AFS
105/2.8D AF Micro
65/4.5 Macro
60/2.8G AFS Micro
28/1.8G AFS
16/3.5 Fish
Df battery charger
D810 battery charger
3 extra batteries
and --
I had room for two more lenses in unused outer drawstring pockets.
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Bjørn Rørslett on August 12, 2015, 23:20:53
I reckon this would easily do double duty as a lady's purse as well ?
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on August 12, 2015, 23:22:44
I was just about to ask, are there any male models?
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: stenrasmussen on August 12, 2015, 23:36:26
Buy some padding inserts for your Ortlieb. Oh man, that lime green colour is cool. One must wear shades at all times to match.

I think a car is the perfect camera bag, by the way.

Just remember my shot of Bjørn and his "bag" (this is his previous one btw):
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: stenrasmussen on August 12, 2015, 23:39:11
2-handled camera bag: Shootsac Tote & Shoot Camera Bag (http://www.shootsac.com/collections/camera-bags)
The bag fits up under your arm nicely like a gym bag.
It also has a clip on shoulder strap available.
The bag weighs itself 3.5 pounds.
The fabric is water-repellant.

Recently I was able to put all of the following
inside this bag due to its unusual construction.

Df + 24-70/2.8 AFS in side pocket with back down, lens up.
D810 + 70-200/4 AFS also in side pocket with back down, lens up.
and inside the bag was a matrix of the following
16-25/4G AFS
105/2.8D AF Micro
65/4.5 Macro
60/2.8G AFS Micro
28/1.8G AFS
16/3.5 Fish
Df battery charger
D810 battery charger
3 extra batteries
and --
I had room for two more lenses in unused outer drawstring pockets.

In other words Andrea...this one is just like any woman's handbag  ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Erik Lund on August 13, 2015, 14:24:59
Dear All,
I have many camera bags.
But somehow, I am not really happy with any of them.
Thanks, Jakov

Thus, with this statement, you have encapsulated the entire universe of camera bag selection, use, and ownership.
I would be tempted to obtain a copy of the gym bag, and seek professional assistance designing and adding padding, pockets and compartments.

Pluton, where does one seek professional assistance when it comes to adding padding?

Out here in the colonies, one would enlist a shoe repair shop for simple sewing modifications for ugly camera bags. (You wouldn't want to modify a good looking camera bag ... you may chip your fingernail polish.)   ;)

Hehe

Or you should have listened when your mother asked you to learn how to use needle and thread… ;)
I leaned to use those tools as well as asewingmachine and Dremel, and have always sewn or modified my own equipment that being for hiking, climbing or photography – It’s very handy to be able to quickly make modifications that suits the purpose better yourself. Just last week before going to Bergen I did some modifications to the insert in my Billingham Hadley Pro. My preferred bag btw. A special light blue with orange lining and olive insert… Perfect size weight for my Leica M kit.

I have a lot of other LowePro bags for Nikon outfits ;-) Strong and durable and modified…
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on August 13, 2015, 15:11:13
Dear All,
I have many camera bags.
But somehow, I am not really happy with any of them.
Thanks, Jakov

Thus, with this statement, you have encapsulated the entire universe of camera bag selection, use, and ownership.
I would be tempted to obtain a copy of the gym bag, and seek professional assistance designing and adding padding, pockets and compartments.

Pluton, where does one seek professional assistance when it comes to adding padding?

Out here in the colonies, one would enlist a shoe repair shop for simple sewing modifications for ugly camera bags. (You wouldn't want to modify a good looking camera bag ... you may chip your fingernail polish.)   ;)

Hehe

Or you should have listened when your mother asked you to learn how to use needle and thread… ;)
I leaned to use those tools as well as asewingmachine and Dremel, and have always sewn or modified my own equipment that being for hiking, climbing or photography – It’s very handy to be able to quickly make modifications that suits the purpose better yourself. Just last week before going to Bergen I did some modifications to the insert in my Billingham Hadley Pro. My preferred bag btw. A special light blue with orange lining and olive insert… Perfect size weight for my Leica M kit.

I have a lot of other LowePro bags for Nikon outfits ;-) Strong and durable and modified…

Erik, my mother taught me how to knit, at least she tried until my father found out what she was up to :D

I solemnly declare that I will make my own padded insert, and I will show you my masterpiece when the time comes!

By the way, in order to be consistent, I completely forgot to tell you and Jan Anne something regarding your Billinghams:

"They are equally beautiful as Bjørn's and Gary's Domke bags!"

Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: tommiejeep on August 14, 2015, 06:51:24
Ah, the perfect bag.... doesn't exist!
Too bad the Billinghams are so ugly, I would have sold you a Billingham 445 (Sage and Tan) cheap  :).  Just cut the flap off  ;) .   I bought it for a specific project for the D3S and D700.  Gets too heavy when fully loaded.  My wife loves it as an overnight bag for Mumbai but not used as a camera bag.

Some bags seem to almost meet your requirements . That Ortlieb in Lime Green certainly does not 'scream' cameras .    Lowepro Dryzone, but looks a pain to get into. Gura gear sells just the insert for their Chobe travel bag.  If you have a good LowePro dealer have a look at their bags, not to buy, but to see if they have an insert that would fit your needs.  Temba also sell inserts, for their Messenger and Messenger /Laptops, separately.

 I bought the insert from a LowePro bag to fit a no name , wheeled carry on which I was  using for a 3 month trip to US and Mexico.  They did not normally sell the insert separately but Uri, at Grays, called LowePro and asked if they could get him a replacement inset, answer yes so I was good to go  :) .

In a family that has probably 20 or more bags , I have a huge assortment of dividers, inserts and pads for customizing.  Making your own inserts works for me  :)

by the by,  the Billingham Hadley Pro is my most used and my wife uses the Hadley Small when not using one of her Epiphanie fashion bags ;)  .  I am a huge fan of Vests w/wo small bag. My jeep is my bag 90% of the time so I'm with the F. Bear  :)
Cheers,
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: tommiejeep on August 14, 2015, 07:04:49
8) no camera bag is THE bag...
I have other issues, as I much like to photograph, I hate to carry the gear... and I really not like (hate?) the small cameras and so on... so a dilema here...
So I just use bags to transfer gear from home/studio to car, and then from car to the shoot...
Must have on my bags:
  • butterfly openings
  • light, should I say light?, prefer the gura ones, that are made from sailing tissue
  • whenever possible wheels, I have tailored a small cart to gura bags...
  • water resistant
Pedro, what type of cart are you tailoring?   I really want wheels which can easily go through soft sand.  I used to be able to drive my jeep through the sand to get close to the shore birds with the 500vr/tripod , still can in a couple of places , but the authorities have fenced off the best location so a walk of  half a mile.  Just cannot carry the gear that far.  It is tourist season when I shoot Kite Surfers so I can get one of the Waiters from one of the hotels to hump the heavy gear for me  :)

I tried a golf bag trolley and a 3 wheeled baby stroller but the wheels are too small and thin  .  I found an all terrain, 3 wheeled baby buggy that looks good but $800!!!
Cheers
Tom

Edit:  I did try to have some thing fabricated using motor scooter wheels but no one working with light weight metal tubing so weight became a big factor.
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: afx on August 14, 2015, 07:38:52
I tried a golf bag trolley and a 3 wheeled baby stroller but the wheels are too small and thin.  I found an all terrain, 3 wheeled baby buggy that looks good but $800!!!
German nature shooters often use Eckla trolleys:
http://www.eckla.de/en/trolleys
http://www.eckla.de/en/eckla-multitrolly-2.html
http://www.eckla.de/en/eckla-beach-rolly-models.html

The Multi is about 200€, the beach models are even cheaper.

cheers
afx
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: pw-pix on August 14, 2015, 07:44:18
Gura Gear and Thinktank seem to be making useful bags that aren't weighed down with a ton of padding and heavy materials.
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: tommiejeep on August 14, 2015, 08:11:57
Andreas, wow, that multi trolley looks perfect for an old guy like myself.   Even when I take the heavy gear to the Lake I have to make 3  trips back to the jeep ( about 100 mtrs up hill) to get everything , including my fold up camp chair, set up.  This trolley looks a single trip down hill and one up hill  ;) .  Now to work out the least expensive way to get it to India.  Funny, Indian Customs and Excise can be really funny when you import something they have never seen or heard of.  Trying to get a small, propane Bar-B-Q (no bottle), through customs was a real experience  ;)

Shame I did not know about this when my wife and son went to Italy in June.  They were flying Business Class and as Frequent Fliers .   Lots of spare weight for bags :( .
Many thanks,
Tom
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on August 14, 2015, 09:45:08
Gura Gear and Thinktank seem to be making useful bags that aren't weighed down with a ton of padding and heavy materials.

Hi Peter, thanks so much for your tip to check out Gura Gear.
The CHOBE 19-24L is the best bag that I have seen ever. It is almost exactly what I was looking for. I knew that a distinguished member of NG would ease my endless search!
Two handles for carrying, plenty of space for gear, no-flaps-knee-rests-pillows-rain-covers, space for a laptop too, multi-purpose, airline friendly, and the most important part of the entire equation is that I would proudly carry the bag on my shoulder and be seen by any donkey in the world :)

Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jan Anne on August 14, 2015, 17:07:20
Ha, didn't know Gura Gear also made a messenger style bag, that Chobe 19-24L does indeed look very very interesting and might be a suitable replacement for my aging Billingham Headly Pro.

I have the original Gura Gear Kiboko backpack since the 2009 NG safari that their attention to detail, used materials and usability in the field is nothing like I have seen before.
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jørgen Ramskov on August 14, 2015, 17:49:04
Jakov: Funny how taste differs, I personally don't think that Gura Gear is pretty (I don't think it is ugly either), I much prefer the look of the Domke bags. 

My walkaround bag is this one: http://www.thinktankphoto.com/products/retrospective-10-pinestone-shoulder-bag.aspx
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: pluton on August 14, 2015, 19:05:45
These guys have the real sand wheels, but it appears you'd be dealing with Indian Customs again.
http://www.wheeleez.com (http://www.wheeleez.com)
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on August 14, 2015, 20:00:54
Ha, didn't know Gura Gear also made a messenger style bag, that Chobe 19-24L does indeed look very very interesting and might be a suitable replacement for my aging Billingham Headly Pro.

I have the original Gura Gear Kiboko backpack since the 2009 NG safari that their attention to detail, used materials and usability in the field is nothing like I have seen before.

I am glad you like it Jan Anne. And I am even more glad that you like the quality of Gura Gear. I haven't yet decided to buy (Ortieb's fault) but it's on top of the list thus far.
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on August 14, 2015, 20:12:10
Jakov: Funny how taste differs, I personally don't think that Gura Gear is pretty (I don't think it is ugly either), I much prefer the look of the Domke bags. 

My walkaround bag is this one: http://www.thinktankphoto.com/products/retrospective-10-pinestone-shoulder-bag.aspx

Jørgen, I am not surprised that you like Domke and Billingham as the majority of the world's photo community probably does.
De gustibus non est disputandum - Taste is not for discussion :)
Your Thinktank is nice, but it doesn't have two handles and it has a flap...
I saw other Thinktank Urban Disguise bags that look also nice, but have a peculiar flap on the front side of the bag, to which I don't know the purpose?

Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Øivind Tøien on August 15, 2015, 02:20:20

Best use for those ThinkTank flaps (from the mover 5 and 10 bag)   ;D

(http://otoien.zenfolio.com/img/s10/v107/p1397905663.jpg)
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on August 15, 2015, 02:30:50
Øivind, I see you are also thrilled with flaps :D
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: tommiejeep on August 15, 2015, 04:13:30
These guys have the real sand wheels, but it appears you'd be dealing with Indian Customs again.
http://www.wheeleez.com (http://www.wheeleez.com)
Keith, those are some wheels!  It will probably be easier for me to get the Multi Cart from Germany since my wife is heading for the UK in October.

This guy actually brought his 'Buggy' , and a ton of gear, overland from Russia a couple of years ago .  He leaves all of it in Goa year round. Several Kites, a big Paddle Board and the buggy.
 
http://images.nikonians.org/galleries/data/11779/D3S_3390.jpg
http://images.nikonians.org/galleries/data/12399/D30_1727.jpg
http://images.nikonians.org/galleries/data/500/D30_1778.jpg
Many thanks,

Tom
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Øivind Tøien on August 15, 2015, 05:44:15
Øivind, I see you are also thrilled with flaps :D
;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jørgen Ramskov on August 15, 2015, 09:25:37
Jakov: Funny how taste differs, I personally don't think that Gura Gear is pretty (I don't think it is ugly either), I much prefer the look of the Domke bags. 

My walkaround bag is this one: http://www.thinktankphoto.com/products/retrospective-10-pinestone-shoulder-bag.aspx

Jørgen, I am not surprised that you like Domke and Billingham as the majority of the world's photo community probably does.
De gustibus non est disputandum - Taste is not for discussion :)
Your Thinktank is nice, but it doesn't have two handles and it has a flap...
I saw other Thinktank Urban Disguise bags that look also nice, but have a peculiar flap on the front side of the bag, to which I don't know the purpose?

It's got 1 handle and a shoulder strap. Not sure where you'd place the second handle? The flap is the only cover the bag have, they could use a couple of zippers instead but I actually think this is an easier way to enter the bag. It closes with velcro, which is noisy, but you can silence the velcro if needed.
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Frank Fremerey on August 15, 2015, 09:36:25
I just acquired a new camera bag. Make is "Madame Heliose"
as designer and La Marelle as manufacturer.

with all lenses and bodies it is on the heavy side and not good
 for rainy days either.

but it doubles as a bucket if you need to transport water...
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Erik Lund on August 15, 2015, 11:26:04
Is it the nice blue one on the left?....  :o
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on August 15, 2015, 11:34:39
Jakov: Funny how taste differs, I personally don't think that Gura Gear is pretty (I don't think it is ugly either), I much prefer the look of the Domke bags. 

My walkaround bag is this one: http://www.thinktankphoto.com/products/retrospective-10-pinestone-shoulder-bag.aspx

Jørgen, I am not surprised that you like Domke and Billingham as the majority of the world's photo community probably does.
De gustibus non est disputandum - Taste is not for discussion :)
Your Thinktank is nice, but it doesn't have two handles and it has a flap...
I saw other Thinktank Urban Disguise bags that look also nice, but have a peculiar flap on the front side of the bag, to which I don't know the purpose?

It's got 1 handle and a shoulder strap. Not sure where you'd place the second handle? The flap is the only cover the bag have, they could use a couple of zippers instead but I actually think this is an easier way to enter the bag. It closes with velcro, which is noisy, but you can silence the velcro if needed.

Jørgen, you cannot place a second handle on a bag if it has a flap. Even the one handle on the flap is in my experience uncomfortable to carry. I have bags with flaps, one with velcro (Crumpler) the other with awkward buttons (Lowepro). Both bags are quality bags. Plenty of space, excellent protection, adjustable padding, pockets for bits and pieces, they even look nice. Everything is fine until you start carrying them :) And I am not complaining about the weight, and that is not the bag's fault after-all. I hear people complaining about a bag because it's heavy. Well, you loaded it :)
I am purely talking about a bag to carry in the field, to work, a day trip, or whatever else. I suppose that I should go for a rucksack if I am into carrying it comfortably in the field...
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on August 15, 2015, 11:35:39
Is it the nice blue one on the left?....  :o
:D :D :D
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: chris dees on August 15, 2015, 11:35:49
Jakov: Funny how taste differs, I personally don't think that Gura Gear is pretty (I don't think it is ugly either), I much prefer the look of the Domke bags. 

My walkaround bag is this one: http://www.thinktankphoto.com/products/retrospective-10-pinestone-shoulder-bag.aspx

Jørgen, I am not surprised that you like Domke and Billingham as the majority of the world's photo community probably does.
De gustibus non est disputandum - Taste is not for discussion :)
Your Thinktank is nice, but it doesn't have two handles and it has a flap...
I saw other Thinktank Urban Disguise bags that look also nice, but have a peculiar flap on the front side of the bag, to which I don't know the purpose?

It's got 1 handle and a shoulder strap. Not sure where you'd place the second handle? The flap is the only cover the bag have, they could use a couple of zippers instead but I actually think this is an easier way to enter the bag. It closes with velcro, which is noisy, but you can silence the velcro if needed.

I have this one as well and I'm pretty happy with it.
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Frank Fremerey on August 15, 2015, 14:16:29
Erik. Because I made a lot of money taking photos of meat and
sausages I guess it is not the blue one in this case.

The blue one is terracotta. Not the best material for a camera bag
For outdoors I follow our leader and have a red car with a trunk as
 my mobile bag. The content of that trunk are many times the price
of the car itself....
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on August 21, 2015, 12:10:18
My lime, latex, sexy, waterproof Ortlieb arrived!!!

First impressions:

- sexy;
- loads of space;
- flat bottom, good for inserts, stands straight;
- the material is so sturdy that I wonder whether I need inserts at all. I'll probably just keep the lenses in their pouches and they should be fine;
- two mesh pockets on the outside, still wondering what i will keep there;
- one inside pocket, but rather small if you want to put your phone, mobile, keys, and other bits and pieces into it;
- the zip is a solid work-out for your fingers and arms :)

Of course, I will continue to inform our community about my love affair with the Ortlieb and how it behaves in the field.

Attached you can see how I placed a D4 with 24-70 attached, a 70-200, 17-35, and 10.5 fish-eye, and I can easily place three times as much into it.

Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Erik Lund on August 21, 2015, 12:16:08
I have more or less the same bag in gray for visiting moist places... Mine came with an camera insert many years ago. Enjoy!
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on August 21, 2015, 13:32:35
A small edit on the inside pocket, there are three layers in one pocket, the zip, the Velcro and in between the pocket and bag. Thus, spacious enough for bits and pieces!
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Frank Fremerey on August 21, 2015, 16:08:28
Cute Ortlieb, real waterproof style.

I'd like Ortlieb to contact Pascale if she makes some cool designs for them:

https://www.google.de/search?safe=off&biw=1920&bih=1091&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=la+marelle+taschen&oq=+la+marelle&gs_l=img.1.1.0l2j0i7i30l2j0i30l6.6013.6013.0.8845.1.1.0.0.0.0.110.110.0j1.1.0....0...1.1.64.img..0.1.109.gloVk6yMxFs
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Kivdul-Lund on October 30, 2015, 21:54:42
For those interested in esthetics, I think the Manfrotto line of camera bags looks really nice. I was hesitating between of their models and a lowepro 350 AW and finally went for the latter -interesting reviews on Amazon helped me in making that choice, read the Manfrotto ones I was considering seemed to be built at a lower standard than the LP.
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Alex Cejka on December 18, 2015, 20:09:00
I am in so far fruitless search for well build and comfortable backpack where I could place 1 body and 2-3 lenses (up 70-200/2.8), 1 flash,  spare batteries, charger, P&S and some other small items.  It would serve as a day pack as well so it has to have space for a windbreaker, water, some food  and other few items.  It has to be cabin approved for flying.  It should not cost arm and a leg. I have Tamrac Expedition 5 for that purpose but it started to fell apart.  Any ideas?
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: pluton on December 21, 2015, 20:07:58
Backpacks are an awful way to carry photo equipment where long walks are required, except for all the other ways... which are worse. As with camera bags, there is no perfect solution.
I haven't seen all the photo backpacks available, just the ones that the local shops display:  Tamrac, LowePro,Think Tank, etc.
None of the ones I've seen in the store have anything approaching a proper internal-frame suspension system---an absolute requirement for carrying heavyish loads over any appreciable distance.
In 2013, I bought a Photobackpacker P3 pack with the full size, customizable padded insert.
I used it on one trip and then decided I had gotten too large a model.  It does properly suspend the load and transfer the load to the hip belt.
http://www.photobackpacker.com/home.php (http://www.photobackpacker.com/home.php)
If I had to do it again, I'd maybe get a smaller pack, and/or a smaller insert for the equipment.
The rational alternative is to get a really good non photo-oriented, internal frame day pack, and pack your equipment as needed.
Most of the time I use an ordinary Kelty Redwing 2650---a barely-acceptably-suspended, medium-sized day pack---and just dump the lenses in using individual LowePro lens cases or thin nylon stuff sacks. 
In most of the places I hike with a camera, dust is a major concern, so having all the lenses exposed to the hostile sand/dust environment every time I open a pack that is employing the open, customizable padded partition-style inserts is not desirable.
Usually, I end up keeping the lenses in individual cases, or in nylon stuff sacks.  The individual cases are a time-consuming hassle when changing lenses, but they do protect from shock as well as dust.
The stuff sacks provide no padding or shock resistance, but do keep the items clean and from grinding metal chips out of each other.

 
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on December 21, 2015, 20:21:57
"Backpacks are an awful way to carry photo equipment where long walks are required, except for all the other ways... which are worse."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA, Keith you are a genious!!!
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Alex Cejka on December 22, 2015, 10:58:48
"Backpacks are an awful way to carry photo equipment where long walks are required, except for all the other ways... which are worse."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA, Keith you are a genious!!!

+1

I prefer backpacks over shoulder bags when traveling or trekking. So far it looks like Think Tank is the closest from what I can pay for. 
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: PeterN on December 22, 2015, 13:18:06
Jakov goes undercover for some unnoticed streetshooting.


My lime, latex, sexy, waterproof Ortlieb arrived!!!

First impressions:

- sexy;
- loads of space;
- flat bottom, good for inserts, stands straight;
- the material is so sturdy that I wonder whether I need inserts at all. I'll probably just keep the lenses in their pouches and they should be fine;
- two mesh pockets on the outside, still wondering what i will keep there;
- one inside pocket, but rather small if you want to put your phone, mobile, keys, and other bits and pieces into it;
- the zip is a solid work-out for your fingers and arms :)

Of course, I will continue to inform our community about my love affair with the Ortlieb and how it behaves in the field.

Attached you can see how I placed a D4 with 24-70 attached, a 70-200, 17-35, and 10.5 fish-eye, and I can easily place three times as much into it.
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on December 22, 2015, 13:42:37
Jakov goes undercover for some unnoticed streetshooting.

Jakov has a tendency of being completely undercover and unnoticed ;)
Then again, her rarely street-shoot :)
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: retief on December 22, 2015, 14:37:43
Pedro, what type of cart are you tailoring?   I really want wheels which can easily go through soft sand.  I used to be able to drive my jeep through the sand to get close to the shore birds with the 500vr/tripod , still can in a couple of places , but the authorities have fenced off the best location so a walk of  half a mile.  Just cannot carry the gear that far.  It is tourist season when I shoot Kite Surfers so I can get one of the Waiters from one of the hotels to hump the heavy gear for me  :)

I tried a golf bag trolley and a 3 wheeled baby stroller but the wheels are too small and thin  .  I found an all terrain, 3 wheeled baby buggy that looks good but $800!!!
Cheers
Tom

Edit:  I did try to have some thing fabricated using motor scooter wheels but no one working with light weight metal tubing so weight became a big factor.

I built my own from an all terrain jogging stroller, look for a used one, I found mine for just over $100 at our local Costco.  This Link (http://www.deweydrive.com/photos/Misc/Photo-Buggy/image001) will show you a couple of pictures.  Just took off all the "baby bits", added a removable shelf and bingo.  Works great across sand, up and down hills, over gravel and grass.  I like this much better than Eckla, as I find the "push" to be easier to manner than the "pull".  Having a brake as well is nice when you stop on a surface that is not level.  And the front wheel for steering makes it much easier to maneuver.  The wheels pop off, frame folds up and the shelf detaches making it very easy to store as well.
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: FredCrowBear on December 22, 2015, 14:46:52
retief - the use/adaptation of the all terrain jogging stroller is brilliant!
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: retief on December 23, 2015, 14:52:38
retief - the use/adaptation of the all terrain jogging stroller is brilliant!

Thank you very much!  I looked at many solutions.  The first one I tried was a collapsible plastic crate bungee-corded to a 2-wheeled fold-up hand-truck with big wheels that I used to use to carry gear to my boat.  Worked fine, but dragging it was a pain. 

Funny the things you hear, though.  I had one couple coming up behind me and I could hear them talking about how nice it was the Grampa was out pushing Grandchild.  Then they got closer and saw what the "Grandchild" was  ;D

It is a simple thing to make, and if you have a thrift store nearby you can generally find one fairly cheap. 
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jan Anne on December 23, 2015, 14:56:21
Now thats funny hahahaha
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on December 23, 2015, 15:41:25
a wheelbarrow would be perfect then  8)
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: retief on December 26, 2015, 07:53:43
a wheelbarrow would be perfect then  8)

While quite an idea, it would not.  Problem is you have to lift the back to move the darned thing and the front wheel does not steer.  WAY too much work lifting that sucker up, even if you do fix up the "barrow" to hold your stuff.

One of the other ideas I have see is a rolling golf club bag.  Now, if you got the automated ones that are powered and roll along behind you, heck, you may as well just get an ATV!
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: pluton on December 27, 2015, 20:54:45
While quite an idea, it would not.  Problem is you have to lift the back to move the darned thing and the front wheel does not steer.  WAY too much work lifting that sucker up, even if you do fix up the "barrow" to hold your stuff.

One of the other ideas I have see is a rolling golf club bag.  Now, if you got the automated ones that are powered and roll along behind you, heck, you may as well just get an ATV!
Golf bag→motorized golf bag→electric golf cart→electric car→ Red Peugeot
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Lars Hansen on March 12, 2016, 13:02:23
Many good advices, views and brands presented here. I've come to the conclusion that I do need a backpack - I'm mostly getting around on bike and hiking.

The idea of buying a regular backpack and some pouches/protection bags is fine. I've looked at the LowePro Rover Pro series that follows that idea and have a dedicated front hatch for getting access to one/two removable camera case(s):

http://store.lowepro.com/rover-pro-45l-aw       

But ... the idea that the backpack must rest on the backside towards the ground when accessing the gear makes me think twice - I frequently find myself hikng in wet and muddy areas. Also, I'm not sure I like the idea that a tripod must be carried on the side of the bag. 

So, currently I'm looking at backpacks from F-Stop gear - here the removable camera bag is accessed via the backside. This also allows me to carry a tripod on the front. It seems like a flexible system with many different camera cases (ICU's), lens bags etc. to choose from. I'm currently considering this model:
http://shop.fstopgear.com/us/product/ajna.html

So .. anyone here on NG have experience with F-Stop bags?

Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on March 12, 2016, 20:40:28
Lars, I haven't used the Ajna, but it seem like a well thought of back-pack.
It's nice to have a multi-purpose bag with many different inserts to chose from.
I can't see how you can go wrong...
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Lars Hansen on March 12, 2016, 21:15:02
Bummer Jakov - I just realised this is not a general bag thread but one you started to ask for advice. Sorry - but thanks for the feedback!
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Jakov Minić on March 12, 2016, 23:10:20
Lars, no need to apologise it is a general bag thread.
If you do choose to buy it, let us know your impressions ;)
Title: Re: camera bag
Post by: Chayelle on March 19, 2016, 18:50:58

I have other issues, as I much like to photograph, I hate to carry the gear... and I really not like (hate?) the small cameras and so on... so a dilema here...
So I just use bags to transfer gear from home/studio to car, and then from car to the shoot...
Must have on my bags:

  • light, should I say light?
  • whenever possible wheels, I have tailored a small cart to gura bags...

I am much like you in regards to getting gear to car...
I found something you might like IF you are still in need...
These are lightweight, padded and hold lots of gear.

I have the Think Tank Acceleration v.1.
I like the way I can configure it, but was not big enough.
Did not want a larger bag, as this is plenty heavy when filled.
(which is how I keep it all the time)

I found a bag with similar dimensions, the Vanguard 46:

Vanguard Divider Bag 53
Interior    21.125 x 15.75 x 6.875
Exterior    22.0 x 16.8 x 7.9"

Vanguard Divider Bag 46
Interior    17.5 x 12.75 x 6.875
Exterior    18.9 x 13.6 x 7.6"

TT Acceleration
Interior    17.75 x 12.5 x 6.75
Exterior   18.5 H x 13 W x 7 D

www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/8880302-REG/vanguard_supreme_divider_bag_46.html