NikonGear'23

Images => Nature, Flora, Fauna & Landscapes => Topic started by: armando_m on February 17, 2019, 23:02:12

Title: Roseate spoonbills
Post by: armando_m on February 17, 2019, 23:02:12

First time shooting this birds

a bit to far for my 70-300

Title: Re: Roseate spoonbills
Post by: Akira on February 18, 2019, 05:47:05

I've never seen or know such unique birds.  Thank you for sharing.  Apparently, your skill for shooting dancers applies wonderfully here.  Hope you won't get infected with GAS.   :o ;D :o

Title: Re: Roseate spoonbills
Post by: Hugh_3170 on February 18, 2019, 08:11:09

On the other hand, the 70-300mm gives a good portrayal of how the birds relate to each other in their environment.

The birds and their colours are most interesting.

Is there a 500mm or 600mm around the corner?

(Actually the 200-500mm works well - well mine has at any rate.)

Quote from: armando_m on February 17, 2019, 23:02:12

First time shooting this birds

a bit to far for my 70-300

Title: Re: Roseate spoonbills
Post by: tommiejeep on February 18, 2019, 08:32:37

Armando, very nice  :) . As an action shooter I really like the last one.  Interesting , I have seen many Roseate Spoonbills on the net recently.   Many with more recognized 'birding' lenses (400mm +).   Seems to me that in bright , harsh light it is tough to get great feather detail.  Your light seems to be better.  Well done.
Tom

Title: Re: Roseate spoonbills
Post by: armando_m on February 18, 2019, 09:24:17

Thanks for your kind comments

I was watching the histograms of the red channel avoiding the highlights to be blown. Maybe my processing is to dark ?

A longer lens has been in my wish list for quite some time now, just never find a way to justify it

Title: Re: Roseate spoonbills
Post by: Hugh_3170 on February 18, 2019, 10:38:44

B&H have the Nikon 200-500mm f/5.6E lens at $US1,400.  Not sure how that would translate as a landed price to Mexico once taxes and postage is calculated.  Or maybe a Tamron or a Sigma?

Title: Re: Roseate spoonbills
Post by: Akira on February 18, 2019, 12:32:02

70-300 VR via FT1 on your V1 could be more justifiable?   ;)

Title: Re: Roseate spoonbills
Post by: ArthurDent on February 18, 2019, 12:45:37

All very nice shots, I am especially partial to your third shot, really like the combination of the bird landing and the difuse reflection on the water,

Title: Re: Roseate spoonbills
Post by: ColinM on February 18, 2019, 15:31:24

Rosy plumage, Rosy sunset

I'm only viewing these on my work laptop - the tones are on the dark side, but still enchanting

Title: Re: Roseate spoonbills
Post by: armando_m on February 18, 2019, 18:26:42

Thanks Colin and Arthur

The 200-500 is currently on sale in amazon mexico ...  ::) but no, not right now

Akira the combination of the 70-300 with FT1 on the V1 will work for still shots, but can be awfully frustrating with it's lack of responsiveness and/or slooow focus hunting even in bright sunlight, I have tried using it to catch surfers who hold a photogenic action for a few seconds and this combo will still miss the action, it simple does not have the "right now" response needed to catch some actions from birds or really anything , so I rather crop from the D800 files than from nothing on the V1.

Title: Re: Roseate spoonbills
Post by: Akira on February 18, 2019, 23:36:26

Quote from: armando_m on February 18, 2019, 18:26:42

Akira the combination of the 70-300 with FT1 on the V1 will work for still shots, but can be awfully frustrating with it's lack of responsiveness and/or slooow focus hunting even in bright sunlight, I have tried using it to catch surfers who hold a photogenic action for a few seconds and this combo will still miss the action, it simple does not have the "right now" response needed to catch some actions from birds or really anything , so I rather crop from the D800 files than from nothing on the V1.

Okay, you already have the combo.  I could have expected the result.  Well, then time for GAS...   :o