NikonGear'23
Images => Nature, Flora, Fauna & Landscapes => Topic started by: bobfriedman on June 24, 2018, 22:33:30
-
Nikon D800 UV-VIS-IR ,AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR ,B-410
1/200s f/8.0 at 16.0mm iso100
(http://www.pbase.com/bobfriedman/image/167701633/original.jpg)
-
i guess i might as well post some comparisons..
Nikon D800 UV-VIS-IR,AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR ,BG-3
1/320s f/8.0 at 16.0mm iso100
(http://www.pbase.com/bobfriedman/image/167701632/original.jpg)
Nikon D800 UV-VIS-IR,AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR ,RG-1000
1/50s f/8.0 at 16.0mm iso640
(http://www.pbase.com/bobfriedman/image/167701630/original.jpg)
Nikon D800E RG-830,Nikkor AF-S 14-24mm f/2.8G ED
1/640s f/5.6 at 14.0mm iso320
(http://www.pbase.com/bobfriedman/image/167701811/original.jpg)
-
These are all marvelous, Bob. Although I must say I like the first image the most.
-
Indeed #1 my favourite.
-
Lovely composition. The RG-1000 is my favorite for the rendering.
-
I like No.1 and No.3, No.1 is my favorite.
Dave Hartman
-
My preference for the IR filter is: the denser, the better. Hence the RG1000 image is my favorite! The use of the WA lens is fitting!
-
My preference for the IR filter is: the denser, the better. Hence the RG1000 image is my favorite! The use of the WA lens is fitting!
Agree, though the colors in the first image are lovely